appear是一种事实性陈述，一般不会用appeared或各种其他时态
appear as是作为...出现，而不是看起来像做了某事

1. B中，doing放在句末，现在分词存在歧义，可能是修饰前一名词的定语，也可能是整句的伴随状语
2. as big as是像....一样大，而鲸鱼的size更应该是一个可变的范围，can更好
3. 长大后去做 grow up to do 长高长胖到某一程度 grow to be(some size)

A，with each+product，错误，同时each是单数，后面不用their；
B，with each as a product of its……，with each+介宾结构作独立主格，修饰印度食物包含很多种类这个句子，语意上=with each style of cooking as product of influence=每种烹饪类型作为地区影响力的产物，主从句在逻辑关系上不属于独立主格表示的原因/条件/伴随发生的事项或补充说明里的任何一种，错误
D是同位语，解释说明先行词style，each a product of=each style of cooking (是)a product of influence，每种烹饪类型都是地区影响力的产物，ok

more than

条件概率

选成b了，我的原因：a 因文中不但describe 而且解释原因了，则不对 b：我认为这个蜥蜴分三个地方住是一种行为，然后整篇文章都在试图解释这种行为，最后一段解释好了，所以我觉得对了 c: 没有contrast两个证据，只是两种推测 d: 感觉前三段都没有researcher的事，就最后提了，所以没有account for恰当，所以没选 e 不是certain anole lizard, 就是anole lizard整体
给我解释下b d 吧，还是觉得自己想的也不偏啊，

let的主语是employers，所以themselves反身给主语是雇主而不是雇员

for doing表原因一般是已发生的原因

as a result只是一个插入语，不影响并列，实质上是两个不定式的平行.

我觉得d应该是错在an event from which their numbers were greatly reduced，把介词滞后会变成an event which their numbers were greatly reduced from，首先from不能很好的表达因果关系，其次reduce from有歧义，会让人误认为是从...降到了...

确实是这样的...伴随状语也必须保持主语逻辑一致...

最高级的表达和比较级的表达，在语意相同的条件下最高级更加简洁

毕老师，请教A答案中的known as 为什么不是就近修饰time？而是修饰loans?

assist sb. in doing sth.

interact with one another表示另一个，each other表示互相
但interact among each other就不对了

名词和动词区别
interactions between other tribes✅
interacted between other tribes❌
interacted among other tribes❌
interacted with other tribes✅

The pronoun problem is worse than you might think. E.g., even if the problem said "... each a product of its regional influences", it would still be wrong.

"Regional influences" are vague forces—basically, like the culinary culture of an entire geographical area. These forces don't emanate from, or belong to, any particular person or thing, so it's impossible for any construction of the form "its/their/____'s influences" to make sense here.

it/they同物指代，that/those是异物指代，指代同类别不同物

m

同问