double as much as the increase of需改为double the increase of。这是因为,当“非数字物体(即,这个名词本身没有纯粹的数字概念,例如dogs、cats等绝大多数名词)”比较时,我们通常会用double(twice) as much as或double(twice) as many as,例如:
twice as many dogs
double as much water
但是,当“数字”比较时,我们不能加as many或as much,例如:
twice the increase
double the decrease
显然地,增长和下降本身就是数字的概念。因此,不能用double as much as the increase of。
as much as, more than;
like不能表示列举,只能表示“像”;
B选项:’new initiatives that try to relieve‘,initiatives 后接that引导的定语从句,initiative不能发出try的动作,所以定语从句应该改成to do不定式表示目的;同时 try的时态也应该是过去时,同announced同一;the patience of its customers and its network,造成歧义,让人将the patience也理解为of its customers, 同时也of its network;
c即使卖家立刻就能生产出来也来不及了,e可以提前两三个月预测,就可以提前一个月打疫苗
送给选d的同学们,不要再纠结了,a就是可以这样类比,虽然不严谨,但是人家说了两种鸟有相似的地方,所以是对的,而如果a 的类比没毛病,那么d就显得不太好了,毕竟要假设离开的原因是因为树少了
样本代表性
that during要和than前面的结构一样才行
when agriculture began相当于一个名词短语。但不如the beginning of好
PREP07 Test 2-96 : There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now as was the case in 1990. 举一反三
PREP07 Test 2-96 : There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now as was the case in 1990. 举一反三
The original subject is "single locusts".
The second part of the sentence doesn't describe single locusts. The subject of choice E is still "single locusts", so E is nonsense.
The appearance of "locusts" in choice A is NOT "less concise"; it's actually necessary, to specify that we're now discussing the behavior of locusts in general, not single locusts.
C 又扯进了第三方...
award sb sth, award sth to sb
in recognition of...
B studies of 后面应该加一个名词, 而且how与formation不平行
CD里面的rotating是在修饰discovery is吗
题目中列举了人口数量稳定和地理隔离两个事实,但确实看不出来是后者prevent了人口数量减少。。。
对于C:勉强地觉得limit=not eliminate?eliminate和limit似乎不兼容?仔细体会文章的意思C还是不冲突的....
abc:with nearly 9000 tons /the sale, 这里的因果关系应该是那个句子的whole idea而不是句子中的一个名词,selling确实比with好很多,只是E中后面的with让人耿耿于怀
体会to do和for doing
(简单题 来不及思考了哇)
SVO: cultivated sunflowers have become a major commercial crop划线的是修饰部分
A:only 强调soybeans,与sunflowers对比,符合逻辑
B:only as a source,强调作为植物油的来源,不符合逻辑
C:being,排
DE:only强调的是second,不符合逻辑,排
分不清主结论和中间结论时,用therefore把两个结论连接一下,看谁能推导谁就ok了!感谢candicelv!
双同位语,表示essay