due to their being so genetically similar to one another 选项中这种格式是不是独立主格啊?
拟人化的用法,profit went to pay higher taxes。its their是a c的区别
不会看 就不会做;会看 就不会错!!!
数字用less/more比较 只有weight用lighter/heavier
毕老师辛苦了!!!您讲的太清楚了,相见恨晚~~~
可不可以看成是因果推理呢?
不可以。因为因果的CQ重点在于因(前提),而方案的CQ重点在于方案本身(此题中为结论)
这样讲真的不是在从答案倒推解题思路吗?
我也觉得这是在倒退思路。我看的逻辑链:大家反对征税----设上限来减少污染。 那么E答案,排除了一个逻辑链中可能的干扰因素--大家反对设上限
B 去掉从句,提取主干,The Sun is also 400 times farther away from Earth 不奇怪吗?
我也知道搭桥的话,选项要和温度相关,但C有什么不对?
C 项说的是small moths更effective 但是按照argument描述的应该是large moths更effectively camouflaged while on vegetation C项说反啦(我也错了 看得太不仔细啦)
不对不对 再去看了一遍题 题上并没有提到camouflage 应该是irrelevant
虽然没有做错 但是让我想到了through, in, by, use的区别;老师能详细讲一下这些区别吗
同问这个问题,through, in, by, use的区别,老师能否讲解一下
4、-ING modifiers don't have a tense. they automatically adopt the tense of the clause to which they're attached
名词强调事件的结果,动名词强调事件的过程。应该是通过XX方式参与了欺骗的行为 而不是因为XX,所以参与了欺骗的行为
globe地球 gone regulated是定语成分 while不用平行 c没b清楚
伴随所表达的因果是一种自然而然的因果,例如:
Jack kicked the post, feeling pain.
“感觉疼痛”是“杰克踢杆子”的自然而然的结果,所以“感觉疼痛”用了伴随状语来表达。但在本选项中,“实际上可以做温度计”显然不是“叫声随着温度而变化”的自然而然的结果,因此不能用伴随状语来表达。
不是同时发生,不用状语
mass 质量
disrupt中断
通过预防疾病这件事节约成本,而不是在疾病的预防里节约成本
1.removal is better.
2.
you can't use 'resulting from' as an adverbial modifier(不修饰动词,只修饰名词), as is done here. in general, 'resulting from' is only used as an adjective modifier, almost always without a comma, as in
the pollution resulting from the chemical spill forced all the local residents to evacuate.
even as" is a transition used to imply simultaneity, and is usually used with parallel tenses (i.e., same tense in both parts of the parallel structure).