A. 缺少主语
B. that ECS wrote的宾语从句修饰不当
C. a call for female..在起草前就被囊括在其中了..不妥
D. 缺少谓语
E. correct

with the result that the act of stinging causes the bee (to die) modifies the main clause: the stinger is barbed and stays where it is inserted.

you can only say "X results in Y" when X is an ACTION. if X is an OBJECT, you can NEVER say that X "results" in anything.

it's perfectly sensible to write that the growth of one thing has been "faster" than the growth of another thing.
• on the other hand, it's wrong to write that a growth rate is "faster" than another growth rate

C选项比较相关，但这个逻辑链仍然不容易推导出来：
超市和宠物店有卖，兽医就卖不出去了？你们买药是优先从医院买，还是去其他地方买？？为了防止你这么想，选项c还多说了一句unlike most equally good competing products sold by veterinarians

how many of the members speak two of the three languages?
会说G的人也会说E！！！
所以！how many of the members speak two of the three languages
是求G+onlyE∩S的人数啊啊啊啊啊！！！
数学问什么一定要看清....

因为本来就开的少，出严重事故的概率自然低。
D选项：24岁和21岁的区别不足以涵盖65and older的人的情况

B选项既是预期又是反方向臆断，肯定不对。C也不够好-----因为是类比选项，容易错误类比的削弱，没有说类比对象的可比性。
除非没得选了，才选类比选项

目标：最大化长期的潜力 in order to maximize the potential for gathering knowledge in the long run
方案：推迟分析最新的遗址

评估方向有：可行性、可操作性、后果好坏

没有理解competitive swimming to children with asthma就是说这些运动员可能小时候训练之前就已患有哮喘。这些孩子确实和竞技游泳有联系。

when you COMPARE two things, the assumption is that they are ALTERNATIVES.

therefore, if a comparison is "misleading", we need a choice that shows that they aren't simply alternatives.

this is what choice (e) does: it shows that some food is irradiated AND cooked. they're not alternatives, so you can't settle the issue with a comparison.

看题不要那么快和想当然。。。（2）中换了一个人

请形成某些该有的条件反射，比如看到代词思考他的reference，修饰词与被修饰对象关系清晰等等基本原则

看到平行不要想太多，然后注意上下文的衔接，不要只看划线句子。E选项平行词后面的句子结构都不一样呀

我一开始觉得没必要用破折号排除了ab，看了ron才知道这是讽刺的说法。。。好的，我再也不用这个点排除了

做完很多prep 08的题并详细研究prep08的语法笔记，发现prep08语法题与现在的语法题有很大出入了。比如说which的就近指代，后置定语的就近指代，在prep08中都是可以跳跃修饰的。这在og16和17中前所未有，OG中140道题我每道题都做了笔记，每个选项都做了细致分析，没有发现一道有跨越修饰的题。且句子工整，非常完美，一点毛病挑不出来。所以说，还是要以OG为主，OG才是最具有发言权的东西。一定要重视OG！做题数量不等于质量！prep与现在的年代久远，很多考点与现在的语法题都有出入（我个人见解），只能作为参考。比如这道题中的比较省略现象，在og16和17所有比较题型中都没有出现过。说明OG已经不推荐这种用法了。朋友们要自行评估，自行思考！

题意！想当然 是 either 0 or 1 不是 neither 0 nor 1

不需知道原来每小时payrate是多少，只需用20，000加上增加的总额0.5*40*50即可。

惯性思维！解着解着题就按照自己脑补的题目去做了，而忘记了题目的要求

我以为是道数学题，没想到是道逻辑题