扫描二维码，直接登录
啊这个解释容易理解多了 独立主格什么的有点难懂 谢谢搬运
这句结构也有问题，如果是with的话，后面应该
with transpiration from soil and from plants *returning* approximately 21 inches to the atmosphere, *the rest 9 inches contributing* to the flow of streams and rivers.
counteract是抵消的意思，说明药物成分留在水里是好的，可以抵消掉有害的物质。
This sentence correctly compares leaf cutters and other ants
with raider ants, but the prepositional phrase in having nests
suggests that it is raider ants, not leaf cutters and most other
ants, that have nests situated underground or in pieces of wood;
however, the rest of the sentence indicates that in fact raider
ants’ nests are not situated in such locations.
这是OG的解释，感觉怪怪的，有人能解释下吗？
我觉得OG的解释是说：按照D选项的表述，这个句子暗示了 ”in having nests situated underground or in pieces of wood"这个行为是raider ants发出的，而不是它的比较对象leaf cutters and most other ants. 但是逗号后面又说，"raider ants make a portable nests by..." 这样的话就前后矛盾并且构不成对比关系了。
谢谢你的解答，OG解释我看懂了，我的问题是为什么”in having nests situated underground or in pieces of wood"这个行为是raider ants发出的？这个是跟在leaf cutters and most other ants的
D里面，“unlike...in pieces of wood"是状语从句，后面raider ants开头的那句是主句，状语的主语是跟随主句主语的（独立主格除外），所以"in having nests... in pieces of wood"这个行为就成了raider ants发出的了。这个是我的理解...要待我再验证一下哈。
我来更正一下我之前的说法。Unlike leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests situated underground or in pieces of wood这个句子确实是修饰raider ants没错的，不过这一部分是作为raider ants的前置定语存在的，不是状语哦。
请问，comma-ing不是修饰整个句子的吗？因为前面甚至不是一个完整的句子，所以我一上来就把A和B排除了
还是说including并不属于comma-ing修饰？是可以用逗号隔开，然后修饰离它最近的名词的？
不知道我有没有说清楚问题，期待回答。TT
including 不属于comma+ing 用法，它是一个介词
非常感谢！