E 错在,KG's becoming。
曼哈顿里说动词优于形容词优于名词,sb‘s doing一般是错的。
e错的原因是因为名词所有格不可以单独拿来指代,换一句话说,名词所有格不是名词。所以her可以拿来指代非名词的所有格
这应该是and连接两个强调句It was ... that ..., and it was ....under her command that.....强调的部分都是在句子作状语成分,一个是became publisher,另外一个是under her command
D选项,enabling it to move quickly through the woods and to step easily over downed trees是修饰long legs的定语,而非状语。them指代前面出现的任何复数名词(legs, woods, trees)都不合逻辑,按指代规则来看应该是修饰tress. 所以该选项语法错误。
show的约束力较弱
考点:
不定式和ing的区别
代词的指代问题
being--同时发生
for example只能 列举 一个 ,例子有两个的时候 用such as
这题怎么定位啊 ?感觉好难。
先看选项,从选项定位(去报班讲的)~其实我也做错了BD间犹豫了,太急没找到原文。
我感觉原文里B选项也有说到呀,在前面的部分。
關於"不能用xxx expect that這個結構", 在曼哈頓第五版SC中提到expect that是正確的(詳列如下) , 請問是否有認知上的差異呢?
**EXPECT
*RIGHT:
We EXPECT the price TO FALL.
The price IS EXPECTED TO FALL.
We EXPECT THAT the price WILL FALL.
IT IS EXPECTED THAT the price WILL FALL.
Inflation rose more than we EXPECTED.
There IS an EXPECTATION THAT the price will fall.
同问
有结果么?同文expect that
Barraland has been supervising convicts on parole more closely in recent years, with the result that parole violations have become significantly less frequent.
Barraland被假释的犯人监管近年来越来越紧密,其结果是违反假释规定变得不那么频繁。
unnecessary governmental regulation
根据图形背景原则,难道不应该use用在主句吗?这件事情更微观啊
我跟你一样的感觉 但是因为有like就把D给排除掉了
嗯嗯,我之前看没注意such as 和like。感觉这才是一个比较重要的考点。其他也可以忽略了
ron不是说过and 前后的句子是independent吗?怎么这里可以连接因果???
located around some communal Great Kivas (underground ceremonial chambers). ......around!!!
A indirectly
原文:biocontrol agents can negatively affect nontarget species by, for example, competing with them for resources。。。Another example of indirect negative consequences occurred in England when a virus introduced to control rabbits。。。
两个并列的例子说明destroy unwanted species。
表示举例时用such as,而不是用like。
this is the problem. if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx.
here, "each" = each style of cooking.
we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".
等比数列求和公式s={a1(1-q^n)}/(1-q)
原式=2+s
E错是因为没有反映出来强调的语气吗?还是因为moving和won high praise在时间上不相近?
动名词作伴随状语一般都暗含动作的先后性,虽然它的时态跟随主句时态,但是如果动名词放在前半句,暗示这个动作是先发生,如果放在后面暗含结果伴随,这里应该是没有这种动作的先后逻辑性,强调的应该是并列的两件事情。