D中as连接的句子是省略了主语structure吗？

艾玛……注意问题是让确认“是不是”!!!!

这篇我觉得很难，很不熟悉specialization 这样的表达。

题目问的很具体，直接看能解释为什么蒸汽工厂能扩散的选项就行

这题真是没谁了。。。 看来大家反应都很强烈

这道题不用看文段直接看问题就可以得出答案- -

为啥不是因果推理呢。 因为货多的时候要囤货，货少的时候要卖出。今年的货是近年中最少的。理应卖出。 找削弱。切断因果联系

C是说的本地鸟不吃rice，而题目中要保护的是rare migratory birds。因此是无关选项。

是不是一般不能通过就近来筛选答案呀？比如：https://bichu.com.cn/question/Prep2012-SC-9 里的which就不是就近修饰Venus,而是修饰a transit of venus，所以这边选项A\B\C需要靠其它的错误来排除

请问一下 ABC 的，which 难道不能跳跃修饰吗

时态 语义

题目提到这个测试是针对“病人们”的，“ a certain medical test performed on patients”，“on a patient referred by the insurance company is $230”价格是针对“一个病人”的，条件（2）未涉及病人数量，独立充分吗？

B选项错误原因：要反驳gb tele并不distort，B说的是在某些特定方面gb tele并不distort，那其实还是distort的

AD分词修饰错误 CE such用法错误

时态排除BCE
AD 相比，A太冗余

(2) the modifier is to be taken as "comma + -ing", a construction that modifies the preceding clause. this is the source of the aforementioned ambiguity.

ron证实了我的观点：in other words, if you introduce that sort of construction, there are now 2 ways to interpret the sentence: (1) the intended interpretation: the modifier, which is set off by commas, is to be neglected in the interpretation of the sentence, and "circling" is to be taken as if it followed "planets" immediately, without a comma (because that's the way it would be if the modifier were removed - neither of the commas would be there anymore).

'Their guild was composed not of family units but of individual women who enjoyed unusual legal and economic privileges.'
family units->NOT enjoyed unusual legal and economic privileges
E works for 'guild membership' NOT those employed by family units

下面是引用别人的，我个人认为这个circling是现在分词做后置定语修饰planet，most of them at least as large as Jupiter可以看做是个插入语，可以不看做句中成分

D.E，mostly作为副词，“主要地，通常地，多半地”，prep07上的解释是修饰错误，以为副词不能修饰名词
C.circling在这里不存在伴随的歧义，伴随一般是指伴随动作，因为本句唯一的句子是天文学家detected...，若认为伴随是不可的，逻辑主语就成了astronomers，逻辑错误；此处circling作定语修饰Jupiter.
另外可用固定搭配排除，as large as or larger than = at least as large as