严格的平行 改变了句子的意思 语法大于句意
原文的转折关系是合理的,应当保留。保留A和B,B选项改变了两件事情的并列关系 同时while引导的从句的省略是不正确的,从语法上省略了her career
as well as这里的用法是因为emit是修饰成分,并不是burn up的并列。因此用的emitting,在逻辑上表并列时,还是应该与前面表平行。
做这道题的时候大概脑子不太好使,或者一直想到很像的另一道题上去了。没有仔细看题干:collared比uncollared生育率低,所以这个dose有问题。但如果park也在其他活动中使用这个药的话,那前面collared与uncollared生育率的区别可能就有别的原因了。(控制变量)
within reach of是在某人触及范围内的意思
the ones 是特指……
rate of sth要慎选
something is acknowledged to be 是一个惯用语形式,意思为某事物被承认/认作为, of great importance也是一种惯用语,意思就相当于greatly important.
感觉瞬间懂了!老师666
在C和E中徘徊,C选项应该是错了一半They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.文中讲的compensation for executive.其实E表明的是大意,就算C对了,也应该选择大意,不选择细节。
as likely as
想问一下这一题E选项them改为it可以算是正确的吗?
我觉得这里动名词和名词的区别不是正在进行和不在进行的区别,而是是否personalize的区别,因为这些disinclination都是每个人都会做的,为了强调,因此用动名词
A: that从句跳跃修饰military garrison,所以谓语要用is;their应该是要指代military garrison,所以应该也要用单数its;as后面的they只能指代前面的letts那些,但是它应该指代detail gathered from Pompeii,比较指代的代词应该用those或者that;so as只能用于否定句中
B: that从句跳跃修饰military garrison,所以谓语要用is;their应该是要指代military garrison,所以应该也要用单数its;
C: their应该是要指代military garrison,所以应该也要用单数its
E: so as只能用于否定句中;
Choice (A) follows the idiom correctly, and it also has the correct order of causality. As we move closer to Manchester, a direct result of that action would be to encounter air that is more acidic. Choice (A) is the best answer.
We need the word "that" following "noting", so (E) is wrong.
Choices (B) & (C) don't have the form, so they are wrong.
Choice (D) follows the idiom correctly, but the order is strange --- it almost seems to imply that making the air more acidic would cause us to move closer to Manchester. That's not the intended meaning, and it doesn't really make sense.
看的时候看成了in 1990和in the previous year 直接选了D 没有考虑句意 切记啊
这篇文章有错误,请及时更正,避免误导学生,谢谢!
宣布计划去削减是svo吗,还是削减是计划的定语?
D选项,During the arrangement is clumsy
C选项的depending是修饰后面be able to的 即s,ving,v+o的形式 ving修饰动词 而E选项中改为形容词修饰了n