直接用一个点就可以判断出这个题目选啥:
B them指代bennefits themselves 指代employees 同一代词指代对象不一样不太好
我觉得D,E中的定语从句也使用错误了,proven records 没有在从句中充当任何成分。
好难
截距是与坐标轴交点到原点的距离,应该是个绝对值,那么这里选择C是因为在这里的slope可以有多个解么,之前看OG问题是求value的时候是求唯一值。
看清楚having错在哪
此题还必须将具体数字算出来才能判断,陷阱呀( ⊙ o ⊙ )!大家注意(⊙o⊙)哦!!!
period 用in 比的是时间
each other 有包括自己another 是别人
In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides ..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant--that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information. Also, the past perfect had been improperly places the elephant's earning in the past, prior to Wootton's; consistent verb tense is needed to show that the actions are simultaneous.
OG10: Choice A, the best answer, uses the idiomatic construction noted... that and clearly focuses on the salient information-- a comparison of annual earnings.
毕老师讲的好清楚
D直接指出Corp的问题,比B更直接
老师我想问a选项than 后面加has oil是什么用法
F是个16世纪英国探险家,从加拿大K岛拿回土壤样本检测金含量。因为测出金含量高,伊丽莎白一世资助了两个开矿队。两个开矿队都没有找到金子。K岛的土壤分析表明金含量低。因此用来测F样本金含量的方法不精确。 求假设即加强,等同取非求削弱--方法准,找一个选项让方法不准了。
注意这种结论是个否定句,求削弱的题目,都可以采用这种转换,变成肯定句求加强;选项里总会有几个选项故意反向坑你,我们努力消灭一切邪恶势力!
题干:SU获得了今年联系的潜在捐款人的80%的捐款。这个比例挺高的,但是跟(那些过去曾经捐过款的人)再捐款的预期比例是一致。所以看起来fund-raisers没有很努力去扩大捐款人的基数。因此80%这个很高的成功率,不能说明fund-raisers 干得好;求削弱;
(c) is, as far as i can tell grammatically correct (although the commas are superfluous in such a construction), but it's simply absurd. the use of "or" here creates a sentence that is weirdly self-contradictory.
C的ranks 是做N突出级别Awho定语从句修饰最近的