4!,第一个人随便坐,后面的相对于他来选位置,4个人4个位置
同位语修饰一句话
比较关系:
A) EBB VS his success 错误
B) she VS his success 错误
C) EBB's poetry VS the success of her husband 错误
D) EBB's success VS that of her husband 正确
E) EBB's poetry VS her husband 错误; her success VS his 正确
C的despite floods in the midwest drought in the south是主语,和are之间有逗号和and,这个是不是也不对呀?
(1) if y > 0, -2x > 0 , therefore x < 0
(2) 5y - 20 = -2x > 3y, therefore 5y-20 . 3y, y > 10,. -2x > 3 *10 , therefore x < 0
D. each is sufficient.
A) 对比E) 发现平行结构不对as indicated in..and by.., as well as... E)中很清晰 is indicated by..., as well as by...
B) 语意有误,根据主干 A ruined structure was indicated by....
C) were错误
第二段加黑是主结论;
A-The first is a claim (Claim只表示宣称,本身没有倾向) the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument;(没有提到准确性的问题,错),the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim. (对);排除A
B-Objection(错,题干是研究表明,不是主观的判断,排除B)
C-The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation(至此对,确实是个证据) that the argument challenges(说前面的证据是对主结论的反对,错,这个证据是倒向/支持主结论的); the second is that explanation.
D-同C,排除
E-the argument favors(前面的证据是对主结论的支持)
考点 more...than.... =》
A) more...rather than...错误
C) more..rather than...错误
考点 平行结构 more likely to do...than to do...
A), yet 表示连接两个句子,但是第二个句子缺少完整的句子结构。yet being so far away from Earth that their apparent.... 由于that引导,导致后面的部分都是修饰成分而非句子主干
我觉得主要的疑惑点是判断最后修饰成分的主语是the cloud 还是 the storm,
A)which引导,应该是指向the storm
B) it指向不明
C)V-ing,应该是指向the cloud
D)根据句子主干,应该是指向the sotrm
E) 根据句子主干,应该是指向the storm
When removed from the water and tilted at various angles with the head up, however, blood pressure at their midpoint drops significantly, and at brain level falls to zero.
A. 西非人没开发过某种主食,一旦米和甘薯引进这种主食就不再种植了;取反则为有一种主食在米和甘薯之前种植过,削弱,正确
B. 没有一种植物是本土的,如果种植,能做主食;谈的是假设,取反为即使有,但也不一定种植,无法削弱结论,错;
体会一下B的if,是一种可能性,不能保证削弱
A句子结构终于看懂了:
most people reported less congestion as the primary benefit
我做错了,(严格按照考场状态做);就我个人而言,排除ACD很容易,但是误选了B,当时认为B有助于保护栖息地;
Faue's study中怎么体现了这一点?
题目的最后不是讲到了,买的时候收费和丢弃的时候收费的区别吗?这个对题目有影响吗?我老感觉是个因果推理,所以就没有往方案上想
为什呢不是果因推理??
前提是果,用bill的给钱多
结论是因,因为credit cardlogo让顾客觉得自己钱多
淡定。个人观点,相关性只是一种特殊的果因而已,A B同时出现得出结论A是导致B的原因,或A B正相关所以A是B的原因。
所以这事儿不用纠结,选一个自己顺手的做就是了,你把这题看成相关那就是加强相关性存在,你把这题看成果因那就是举例加强因果联系。
哇感谢 好像是这样。。做题不能纠结这个是啥类型的纠结太久
因果,果因很重要吗?考试的时候哪有时间让你想这个,知道大概是哪种不就行了。
相关因果和果因的相同点在于都是在找原因。果因是看到现象找原因,相关因果是看到了XY两个变量具有线性关系找原因。他们的技巧相同点在于 有一项是涉及两个变量的选项一定留下,因为这些往往是质疑因果关系的;另一项都是指涉及果,实在寻找导致果的它因 所以这个题不用纠结是相关因果还是果因 。 CQ一样的 相关果因剩下的两个CQ碰到的机会太小了 而且碰到基本就可以辨认出来
多谢分享心得!
定语修饰紧跟先行词
In option C, per mile cost is not a proper factor because the miles traveled in any mode of transportation is not given.
eg if the total miles traveled in air were significantly less than those traveled in other modes, then Avg cost of air (= tot miles * cost per mile) would be comparatively less and the total dollar amount for air would decrease and the argument won't hold true.”