划线部分身后的同位语从句that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses应该修饰的对象是concern,即,是担心贷款帮助了外国的商业。因此,该同位语从句应直接放在concern身后,不能放在passage身后。
1、be known as +n. ; be known to do ; be known for doing ;排除BDE;
2、the number of单数, are known复数错误,排除DE;
3、to become extinct没有 to extinction更优。
用with 或of会使介词的修饰对象发生改变,还得看句意。with 结构表伴随,修饰 built,而 of 结构修饰的是 scale。
传送版上对这题的讨论:http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-578062-3-1.html
B:But 连词后接完整的句子, 缺谓语。
C:Run on," they denounce , say..."
D/E: While 引导从句在开头, 后需接一个句子。
比较对象要一致
A、B缺少谓语
D、E,which修饰有误
emissions must be cut at the source by……,by做状语修饰cut,不是修饰source
排放被减少不是通过化石燃料和替代品这两件东西,而是通过更有效率地使用化石燃料和用替代品来替换化石燃料这两个手段,所以一切by+实体名词的选项都是错的,选C
seem, appear, look是表象系动词,可以直接作be动词使用,表示是,如:
She didn't appear surprised at the news at all.
此外还有固定搭配:appear to be/to have been,it appears that,如:
She appeared to be in her late thirties. 看样子她快四十岁了。
It appears that there has been a mistake. 看来有一个差错。
what是个名词,可以替换成the thing,what appears to be ……,看上去是……的东西
描述的是一段时期的平均温度,用between/and,不用from/to;如果是增长、下降,用from/to
这里是一群科学家一起做的可以看成是(一个)预测,而不是每个科学家各自做一个预测,所以group做单数用。如:
A group of scientists works in the lab.一起、作为一个群体在实验室工作
A group of scientists go their houses after work.各回各家
这里只能用will不能用would,因为前面if没有用虚拟;如果没有这个if从句,用would表示排放最好不要上升之意,比用will好
if did/were to, then would/should/might/could; if had, then would have; if should, then would
Choice C – This choice has verb tense error. Element 2 uses past perfect tense. Whenever past perfect tense is used, there should be a related event in simple past tense to indicate the intended sequencing of event. In this sentence there is no such event and hence use of past perfect tense is incorrect. Furthermore, this choice appears to be wordy. Two relative pronouns referring to same noun – growth seems wordy.
主语the survival of,
not only...but also平行
alcohol is taken rather than consumed. taken 和 consumed平行
not so much X as Y
not so much that...... as that ......
与其说A不如说B A和B要平行
as is the case with noun,sth……,就如……一样
As is the case with sth不需要精确的相关和平行,不需要像like/unlike一样,主句主语是sth的类比对象,如:As was the case in post-world-war-i germany, hyperinflation has been causing general unrest and panic throughout country x.
A、B,指代对象有歧义
D,fossils同位语,保持比较对象一致
比较对象要一致、
Ron: you shouldn\'t precede that with anything - such as the adverb (almost instantly) in choice (e). in order for the comparison to be clear, you MUST begin the main clause with the item that provides the other half of the comparison.
there\'s no difference.
\"(almost) instantly\" is an adverb.
there\'s only one action that could be modified by this adverb -- i.e., \"could summon...\" -- so the
as with的用法:(像,如同)
as with后面不能接名词, 要用As with必须有一个条件,就是句中要有一个句子与其平行。
比如 With......As with.....才可以用As with.
否则只可以用 As is the case with....... As is the case with就没有什么限制了。
C,where引导的地点状语改变了句子重心,
D,gathering做伴随修饰,很好
first, examine the split between 'more ergonomic' and just 'ergonomic'. in this case, we must preserve the meaning of the original statement: the new design is more ergonomic than the old design. if we change this to just 'ergonomic', we're attaching an implication that the old design simply wasn't ergonomic (and that the new design, by contrast, is) - an unacceptable implication. that gets rid of answer choices c, d, and e right there.
another item to examine is parallelism. in this case, in the construction 'X rather than Y' (or its analogues, 'X and not Y' and 'more X than Y'), items X and Y must be parallel.
choice a: conforming... rather than flaunting... <-- good parallelism!
choice b: to the body's shape and not to flaunting shape <-- logically nonparallel and also awkward
choice c: can't use 'more' together with 'and not to' (these are exclusive constructions, sort of like 'both' and 'as well as': if you use one, then you can't use the other), so we don't need to consider the parallelism in the first place.
choice d: can't use 'more' together with 'rather than'; also, bad parallelism between to the body's shape and shape flaunted...
choice e: more to the shape... than flaunting... <-- nonparallel
in fact, the winning choice (a) is the ONLY choice that properly compares 'conforming' and 'flaunting' in parallel. all of the other constructions also change the meaning of the sentence via their alterations of the words.
capability to do;GMAT认为capability of X-ing/in X-ing是wordy/awkward的。
ability:sb&aposs ability to do sth或ability of sb/sth to do sth
capability to do不如ability to do简洁,但不可就此判错。
be able to do
be capable of doing
have ability to do ; ability of sb. to do
have capability to do doing ; capability of sb. to do doing