你。。读读句意有那么困难么

方案推理
方案：取消最多杀5%snow geese的限制
目标：缓解snow geese数量大幅的现状

细节题。

相关→因果

类比推理
P: 花一定时间接触动物的动物园现职员中过敏比例为30%
C: 大众群体里花同样时间与动物接触的人的过敏比例远大于30%

A选项提供了能支持专家推论的两个群体的差异
B选项在”接触动物时间一样“的前提上做文章，属于无关选项
C和D都是无关选项
E选项是削弱项

A：The main verb is "denounce." From there we have two things happening "saying government is doing too much...WHILE...supporting many specific programs." Saying/Supporting is parallel.
B：As soon as we say "they say" again, we've started a new independent clause. That's not okay. Also "they denounce...but supporting" doesn't work
C：they denounce……，they say……缺少连词. Also "at the same time" needs to come BEFORE "they support." If they place it afterwords, it sounds like the people are going to be supporting TWO things "at the same time."
D："While" starts us off in something dependent, then both "saying" and "supporting" are opening up participial phrases. while引导从句，缺主句
E：while they……，supporting at the same time,缺主句。同C,at the same time位置放置的不好，这样会有supporting TWO things at the same time 的歧义。

相关→因果

相关→因果

B:that would control限定修饰a new company
A: 表目的用for doing 还是to do，后者更优；另外，forming现在分词作状语表随之而来的结果，后面又跟个目的，是否合乎逻辑，心里打个问号。

相关→因果推理

因果推理
P: The virus will infect bilby, an endangered native marsupial.
C: Using the virus will increase the threat of native wildlife.

C选项说明在用virus之前bilby就已经被兔子威胁到了，用virus会同时感染bilby和减少兔子数量，正负作用都有，不能说一定增加威胁

果因推理：
P: the number of female adults sea turtles coming back to lay eggs has increased since five years ago.
C: the chemical spill five years ago wouldn't decrease the population of sea turtles.

B选项说海龟10岁才回来产卵，所以这五年过来产卵的海龟至少都是chemical spill之前一年出生的海龟，提供了它因：这五年回来产卵的海龟数量增加是因为chemical spill前五年出生的海龟数量增加，而不是因为chemical spill对海龟数量没影响

比较的是level，另外A中than 后面跟were向前找不到对应平行结构。

主谓一致，排除DE；
时态：C选项现在进行时的被动语态不好，A一般现在时更优；
代词：B-programming them指代不清；
结构：C-but和instead语义重复
语义：比较A和B,本句想要比较的到底是什么呢？are programmed to work vs. learn to work.

B其实偷换了概念，原文说的是牙齿上的heavy enamel，B直接替换成了micro-wear patterns

with plenty of bumps 里的with有“有，用，和”的意思，不如have来的清楚。although应该是可以省略主语和be动词的（如果主语和主句主语一致）。

E 我觉得是any indication太过于绝对了…… 不过这个D还真的蛮难看出来orz

they不能指代前面三个名词，因为前面三个名词不能主动预测（应该是被预测），所以这里的they没有指代对象

between 2 and 100 是 不包括 n = 2 吗？

A:Starfish是个复数，it quickly replaces it只能指手臂能恢复手臂。另外by the animal overcompensating没有逻辑主语
B:独立主格做状语修饰前方动词replaced，动物过度补偿&动物长出extra one or two。正确
C:by the animal overcompensating没有逻辑主语同A
D:If they lose one arm they are quickly replaced意思是如果Starfish掉了胳膊那么Starfish就会被替代。掉了个胳膊不用整个把Starfish替代了吧。LOL
E: E真的挺模糊的，我去英文网站上逛了一圈
In (E), “growing” has been turned into a modifier (“sometimes with the animal overcompensating, growing an extra arm or two”), and I’m not sure that it’s wrong, but it seems a little bit odd to me: when do you ever see an "-ing" participle modifying another "-ing" participle? Meaning-wise, I suppose you could argue that “growing” tells us extra information about when happens when the animal is “overcompensating”, but I think it makes more sense to keep the two actions (“growing” and “overcompensating”) parallel.