D anticipate possible objections to the argument presented in the first paragraph
C The family assuming many of the functions previously performed by schools and churches
有关A An unprecedented demand by women for greater educational opportunities in the decades following the Revolution 选项的重点是demand,
下面三种形式无区别,前后都要用句子,不能只用短语。
D的核心词都能分析出来,见到ing又搞不清了! DE情况一样,核心词一个是food一个是people
made provision和established the library 是两个独立的事件,这里用and更合适,互相之间没有逻辑关系,所以BE都不对
这里fewer than those或fewer than have been都没有问题
less用于不可数,people不可以用less修饰。数量没有高低只有多少,排除lower
that includes a provision for penalties是a merger agreement的定语从句,这里的倒装是因谓语部分is signed太短,因而为了突出主干而倒装。
were established to ensure that patients would be ……and that an independent panel would evaluate……
B: differences in the two ears,原句其实在比较两只耳朵听到的sound的差别, a difference in ……
语义!!spend没有对应的逻辑主语,排除A和C;
Idiom : three times as many as/at least as many as/not so much as /as much so as
C: times要跟代词,不能用empty space.
我自己也认为主旨是与gravitation和适应性有关的,a选项因为只涉及了陆地蛇所以给排除掉了,但剩下的bc都没有提到适应性,所以纠结了很久
create是创造一个新的观点,那么一定有所区别于旧的观点,所以改变a number of prevailing attitudes
A:modifier "having……“逻辑上好像是 修饰they的(前置后能明显感觉不妥)。
我在D和E之间纠结,最后选了E。有大神解释一下吗?
虽然BCDE都有很明显的错误,但还是想问一下A who once thought后面的that为什么可以省略呢?
一组选简单的人说是fair的,另一组被迫选难的说是不fair的;结论:双标GAP:因为诉说公平与不公平的是两拨人,选了简单任务的那拨人说公平,被选择任务的那拨人说不公平。这样的前提是得不出结论的。唯有同一拨人在不同情况下表现出不同的看法,才能说明他们是双标。
assumption题选择,否定some,就是not some,就是all。而否定most,就是not most,就是some