Since the 1850s researchers have tried to show that variations in seasonal weather are connected in some way with sunspots, the outward sign of an increase in the Sun's activity. However, scientists lacked evidence supporting such a link until the mid-1980s, when van Loon and Labitzke compiled statistical evidence suggesting that a link exists and that it involves winds in the upper atmosphere above the equator which reverse their direction, from east to west or west to east, every twelve to fifteen months. This phenomenon is called the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), and although meteorologists have known about the QBO since the 1950s, until the 1980s no one recognized a subtle but statistically significant link between the QBO and certain patterns of weather. When the west to east direction of winds in the upper atmosphere coincides with periods of high solar activity that occur approximately every eleven years, winters in the eastern and central United States are very cold.
On this basis, some meteorologists predicted that the winter of 1988-1989 in the United States would be severe. However, the winter was a mild one overall, and the meteorologists' attempt to make the connection between the Sun and weather on the Earth appeared unsuccessful, until Barnston and Livezey proposed a hypothesis explaining why the prediction had failed. They argued that the prediction had not taken into account another important element in the climate: the more or less regular pattern of fluctuations in the temperature of the surface waters of the tropical Pacific Ocean.
Barnston and Livezey noted that when the water temperature is abnormally high-the phenomenon called EI Niño- the chances of cold winter weather over North America increase. The opposite situation, when surface temperatures are well below normal-La Nina-is far less common. In fact, until late 1988 no one had seen the combination of La Nina, westerly winds in the upper atmosphere, and high solar activity. Thus, according to Barnston and Livezey, La Nina canceled out the effect of the other two climatic factors and caused the mild winter of 1988-1989. Although this hypothesis is plausible, much research remains to be done before meteorologists can establish and explain the effects of increased solar activity on seasonal weather changes.
The author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements about the link between increased solar activity and certain seasonal weather changes on the Earth?
Because the evidence supporting such a link is questionable, future research in this particular area does not look promising.
Because it is unlikely that such a link can be definitely established, scientists should concentrate their efforts on investigating the role La Nina and other climatic factors play in influencing global weather patterns.
Although some circumstantial evidence suggests that such a link exists,it is unlikely that future research will be able to confirm the existence of this link
There is evidence supporting the existence of such a link, but without further scientific investigation that evidence cannot be considered proof that such a link exists.
Since the evidence clearly supports the existence of such a link, further research should focus on determining the implications of this link for the accurate prediction of changes in global weather patterns
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D。因为文章指出,虽然有一些间接的证据表明存在这样的联系,但在不进行进一步的科学研究的情况下,证据不能被视为证明这种联系的存在。
我在D和E之间纠结,最后选了E。有大神解释一下吗?
啊,文章最后一句应该是关键!
虽然 statistical evidence 存在,但attempt appeared unsuccessful。 表达的是理论可行,实际没成。即 still can not be considered proof,未被证实的意思
E : further research should focus on determining the implications 原文只是说没解释清楚之前,还有很多研究得做。应该研究什么没有讲出来所以focus on 的内容不对。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论