B. Inhabitants of the area around Lake Champlain claim sightings of a long
and narrow “sea monster” similar to the one reputed to live in Loch Ness,
which, like Lake Champlain is an inland lake connected to the ocean by a
river.
D: 时态不对,不能用have been killed
deterring to the nuclear industry is not correct, as deter is a transitive
verb and requires a direct object
B:red giant stage 是 depending 前唯一的名词,会被认为是指代的这个,句意就不对了
underwritten by, 如果修饰program那么就违背了本意
like+ 名词,
As 引导一个句子
不知道啥能和skater比较
(hopefully)however, it must be used at the
beginning of a sentence or at the beginning of an independent clause, and be
set off by the use of commas
The use of like incorrectly implies that electromagnetic waves are a type of
matter.
overlook不能加that
Liable is sometimes used informally as a synonym of likely, but
in formal written English, it is typically used only where the potential
outcome is undesirable. In this sentence, likelyis rhetorically a better
choice.
关键是increase, 不是其他的
D : This is because may not can be interpreted to mean are
not permitted to. This is of course not the intended meaning here; might
not cannot be interpreted in this way, and so would be preferable.
less...than....
paying是动词ing,只有在做形容词修饰同一个对象的情况下才能和其他形容词并列(from Manhattan语法)
主要是因为不能说smoothly shaped. B是同位语从句
aim to: 旨在,目标是
aim at: 针对....
不能说目标是防止xxx吧?目标应该宏大一点
prevent XXX from XXX: 阻止. 所以from 后面一边是主动语态。你不能说防止阻止A被怎么样,这逻辑不通。
1. neither nor
2. reasons for +结果; for reasons of +原因
3. it 指代不了复数
can 和 may 平行
啊所以这个assemblers是工厂流水线上的工人吧。我一直以为是帮客户把买回家的电视装好的售后之类的......
哈哈哈哈我也是这样以为
我也是,看了五分钟,完全不明白
我也是,
我也是
to manipulate people's perceptions或者for manipulating people's perceptions应该都是a tool的定语,tool作为工具应该能够改变manipulate的状态,是否用不定式更合适?
D选项里面的written while he lived in France在本选项中是非限定性定语从句吗?没有引导词啊;那如果是非限定性定语从句的话,表修饰有什么不对吗?
非限定即去掉不影响句子主干,这里"written in France"这个modifier是必须存在的,所以要用限定修饰
补充:James Baldwin的书不一定都是他在法国的时候写的,所以,written while he lived in France应该用限定性定语从句。
我还是没明白为什么是限定性/非限定性定语从句,因为我没找到引导词。。。印象中得有个which, that, 之类的词呀
按照非限定性定语从句表示修饰,限定性定语从句表示性质的话。那么在这里就是前者说明这个人所有的books 都是在法国写的;后者说明句子里说的books都是在法国写的。明显后者更符合题意, 是这样吗?~
语法学名叫过去分词短语。逻辑上相当于简化过的定语从句,简化原理和伴随状语相同。
单纯从这个从句上来说,没有什么不对的。选项D主要的问题是the books of James Baldwin无法表达出是James Baldwin写的书。因为of是所有格,只能表示James Baldwin拥有的书,不知道是否是他写的。
了解!谢谢老师!解除了我的纠结!用 of 所有格解释我就能理解了
D选项 逗号+过去分词为什么不是状语还是做前面名词的定语呢