求的是现在的worth ，注意题

我这猪脑子，上考场用这个知识点来排错显然不现实

intuition offers a surer road to truth than ... 没有说offer discipline needed in the search for truth

全文都在讲五个writer, 而且开头第一段第一句提到了

a group collectively known as the subprime lending market是borrowers的同位语。

没看懂题。
B：如果肩突硬蜱的幼虫现在食物不足的话，那么当食物种类和数量增加的时候，只能活更多的肩突硬蜱，而不会减少吃某种食物的幼虫的数量。

非数字物体通常用double(twice) as much as或double(twice) as many as,当数字进行比较时直接用twice或double

Ron的解释
A选项中的being： "being" doesn't make sense because it's not parallel to anything in the earlier part of the construction.
B：the real problem is that "is" has no parallel in the first part of the comparison - i.e., the first part doesn't say "is emitted" or "are emitted" - and so the comparison is wrong.

虽然suffer和from是固定搭配，但是本选项中from身后dwindling food supplies的核心词是错误的。在逻辑上，suffer from身后的内容应该是suffer的原因。本题中海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是“食物供给”。试想，只有供给变坏，才能导致受灾，而食物供给本身是中性的，不会导致生物受灾。

possibly as a result of an increase是food supplies were dwindling的状语。

翻译：最近关于20世纪20年代美国的女权主义学者对早期的解释提出了挑战，这些解释以妇女选举权运动中未遵守的“承诺”来评估20世纪20年代。
评估...
E, 不是对于选举权不重要，是对于衡量...不重要

错选了e, 并未正确理解第一段最后一句话的意思。且第二段开头有however转折了，那就是顺着第一段尾句回答问题了

BD 差异：cranium 颅骨
A: 没有主语
B: 一直到that is 都是对的，问题在于that is 就近指代是the skull， 但实际应该指代bony house, 指代不清晰
C: 没有谓语
D: 意思“科学家对恐龙大脑的了解来自对头盖骨的研究，头盖骨是颅骨后部的大脑骨腔。”，逗号后面是同位语/定语
E: 首句小倒装，and 后的it 指代不清楚， this也指代不清楚

- Minor problem is "what they had not..." vs. "something they had not..." The "what" construction is awfully strong, suggesting that this was THE ONE THING they hadn't thought possible.
* As an analogy, compare the meanings of "I want to do what I love for a living" and "I want to do something I love for a living." The first suggests that the speaker has one particular field in mind; the second doesn't.

比n还要多n+3/8

这个2+2等于2的平方 2的平方＋2的三次方等于2的四次方 2的四次方加2的四次方等于2的五次方 以此类推 2的八次方加2的八次方等于2的九次方

人类出现早于11000年前不应该说明人类有可能对灭绝造成影响么

c they指代不清ones 指代不明，opposite of 对面 opposite to 相反

E 找不到具体的错误，感觉主要是不如C简洁?

形式主语it

there is多余累赘，so as to的主语是grader，并不是通过做了什么才不浪费水。而是他把地整平了，继而不会滑坡漏水。排除14