C has a problematic pronoun (it) - logically refers to Wash Post but structurally could refer to KG or publisher. Also, this sentence indicates that it moved into the first ranks as a result of having won high praise. The original sentence doesn't indicate that meaning and we can't just change the meaning of the sentence.
D is a sentence fragment - there's no verb for Wash Post, which is the ostensible subject.

B uses past perfect incorrectly (simple past for "it was only after" and past perfect for "it had won high praise" which comes later chronologically than when KG became publisher)

个位数是5，十位数可以是0～149：1*150=150个
十位数是5，个位数可以是0或5，百位数可以是0～14：2*15=30个
百位数是5，个位数可以是0或5，十位数可以是0～9，千位数是0：2*10=20个；或千位数是1：1500=1个；共201个。

C 没有关于E的古代评论
题目说的，L(中世纪手稿中)没关于E的古代评论，进一步放大范围是中世纪手稿中没有关于E的古代评论。

D M在L（中世纪手稿中）有关于古代评论，推不出M在中世纪手稿中没有评论。
E E在L（中世纪手稿中）没有评论，可能推出E在所有中世纪手中稿没有评论。

Dependent clauses:
while you were sleeping
when Harry met Sally
ever since I bought that monkey
because the fuzz gives me the chills

whenever two independent clauses are joined by conjunctive adverb (consequently in this case) semi-colon is used.

求问A为什么不对
explanation 和 conclusion 有区别吗？
最终排掉是因为我觉得后面那个不是part of explanation 它就是全部
这样理解对吗？
感谢！！！

#repost Ron's comment
in statement 1, both m and p are even. therefore, the remainder is even, so it's greater than 1.
done.
sufficient.

--
statement (2)
just pick various numbers whose lcm is 30.
notice the numbers selected above:
5 and 6 --> remainder = 1
10 and 15 --> remainder = 5 > 1
insufficient.

读懂题目就会了。
在某所高中，学习日语的学生超过100人。同时学习法语和日语的学生占学习法语总人数的4%。问在哪种条件下学法语的学生比学日语的多。
1.同时学习法语和日语的学生有16人。
2.同时学习法语和日语的学生占学习日语总人数的10%。
解：只考虑1，同时学习两种语言的人是16，而这些人只占4%在法语总人数里，那法语总人数：16/4%=400.题目说学习日语的人超过100，没说具体多少，500也是超过100，这个条件不充分。
只考虑2，同时学习两种语言的人是固定不变的，这部分人占法语的4%，占日语的10%，同样的人数在日语里占比更重，那明显法语总人数是比日语高的。
故2条件充分，1不充分。

在习语上，between必须加and，而不能加to。

破折号是一个很神奇的符号，身后的内容既可以修饰一个词，也可以修饰一个句子。在本题中，破折号身后加上用that引导的从句或者省略这个that都是可以接受的。
A. reducing their numbers是伴随状语，其逻辑主语应该为其所修饰的句子的主语
if the clause on each side of the typographical spot in question is an independent clause – if each of them can stand alone as a complete sentence – if you could sleep at night knowing you put a period and a capital letter there instead, then you can put a semicolon in there. If not, you can’t

since作为时间状语的标志时，表示“自从...” ，因此其修饰的主句用完成时态是更合理一些的。

我想问A 中的their可不可以指代in many parts of the world啊。。。。。

这道题的破题店不应该是would和have，而应该简单地只用economic和economical，以及比较对象是否合理来区分

serious！！！

平均数陷阱

B取非我理解，A为什么不对？
A 取非：


Canceling highway projects was the only way for the president to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.那就说明总统是报复反对党啊

Mashika: If P⊆Q, Q∩R = Ø (逆否命题: If Q∩R ≠ Ø, P⊈Q)
Salim: Q∩R ≠ Ø
Therefore, P⊈Q (Choice B)