我艹......分子分母都要减Y

为什么c选as much as放后面就不能修饰hours

1）通过电脑和打印机的倍数关系确定二者大小关系，电脑C最多是打印机P的3倍，也就是C ≤ 3P
The number of computers can be at most 3 times the number of printers
Let C = the number of computers purchased
Let P = the number of printers purchased
So, we can write: C ≤ 3P
Subtract 3P from both sides of the inequality to get: C - 3P ≤ 0

2）买电脑和打印机一起的钱z最多不超过是$9100
Computers cost $1,500 each, and printers cost $300 each.
So, the total cost of purchasing C computers and P printers = 1500C + 300P

What is the greatest number of computers can the company buy if it has a total of $9,100 to spend on computers and printers?
This tells us that the total cost cannot exceed $9100
So, we can write, 1500C + 300P ≤ 9100

3）联立不等式，求得C的范围
We now have the following system of inequalities:
C - 3P ≤ 0
1500C + 300P ≤ 9100

Take the top inequality and multiply both sides by 100 to get:
100C - 300P ≤ 0
1500C + 300P ≤ 9100

Since the inequality symbols are facing the same direction, we can add the two inequalities to get: 1600C ≤ 9100
Divide both sides of the inequality by 1600 to get: C ≤ 9100/1600
Simplify to get: C ≤ 5.something

C最大是5

T=40/60=2/3
T1=20/50=2/5
T2=2/3-2/5=4/15
S2=20/(4/150)=75

看不懂为啥是转折关系，既然11月份好卖，卖的更好不是更好解释么

and the time required for a stroke is exactly equal to the time interval between strokes
敲钟和间隔时间一样
敲6次+间隔5次 = 11
22/6 = 2
12+11 = 23
23*2 =46

假设总收入是x

【文字解读有问题】for any week is $360 plus 6 percent of the portion of A's total sales above $1,000 for that week.
翻译：360 + 6% of the 总收入x超过1,000的部分

which will be
360+6%(x-1,000) = 8%x
x = 15,000

因为公约数不能大于两数

这题不给条件也推的出？

3P+1>10且2P<10，P可以取3、4。
有3P+1=S+10：
P=3时，S=0；P=4时，S=3。

方案模式
为了吸引住民，建造公共设施

削弱，削弱方案可行性/可操作性，说明否定性副作用

A、developers将建设设施的花费转化为高房价，把住民推得更远了，付不起房价，方案可行性弱；有力的削弱，CORRECT

B、轻工业带来更多就业机会，无关
C、其他城镇也着手做类似的事情吸引住民（说明它是可行的），增强
D、developers将建造公共设施的成本早就算进总成本里了（意译），具有可操作性，增强
E、一些新买房的人将recreational列为买房重要影响因子，可行性强，增强

需要多嘗試幾個梯隊，不能一看到25*2 + 10 *1 + 5 = 能湊出最小的數字65就完成
需要嘗試25盡可能多

主要題目沒理解清楚

記得要+1
因為 35, 85都是odd, 所以需要+1

这篇文章虽然是一段式，中间对比信息比较多，但是在读的过程中把文章分section。就会发现结构很明显。
一开始一个theory解释女性选举权变高
接着作者一个一个反驳
先是经济发展
再是城市化
最后作者也没有下结论到底是因为什么，所以就是纯反驳第一句的theory

有了文章架构，每句话也就知道为什么写了，无非就是statement/support上一句。碰到detail回去定位，找和定位最相近的答案。碰到infer回去定位，再顺着作者写作逻辑稍微推理一下

定位到文章最后：However, these cantons often shared other characteristics—similar linguistic backgrounds and strong leftist parties—that may help to explain this phenomenon.
就说明能够让这些城市cantons女性选举权高的真正原因是因为它们shares some other 特质

逻辑：人多能够导致报告多

由increases in domestic grain production are unlikely + (steadily increasing per capita consumption of meat + it takes several pounds of grain used as feed to produce one pound of meat)，推出：
为满足逐渐增加肉需求量，要么直接肉进口，要么增加谷物进口喂养更多牲畜，要么两者并行。

答案错了，我对了，选A。

E选项Being sent的逻主语成了Satellite radio transmissions，不符合常识，显然这里要说的是【those of AM和FM】将音响直接由地表信号塔传导到车里，B选项which就近指代它没毛病。