A city plans to attract new citizens with new housing and new facilities such as parks, recreation centers, and libraries. One component of the city's plan is to require that developers seeking permission to build this new housing provide these additional facilities at no cost to the city.
Which of the following, if true, would point to a possible flaw in the city's plan?
Developers would pass along their costs to the buyer, thereby raising the cost of housing units beyond the ability of likely purchasers to afford them.
Light, nonpolluting industries have located in the area, offering more jobs and better-paying jobs than do the more-established industries in the area.
Other towns and cities nearby have yet to embark on any comparable plans to attract new citizens.
Most developers see the extra expense of providing municipal facilities as simply one of the many costs of doing business.
Studies show that purchasers of new houses, especially first-time buyers, rank recreational resources as an important factor in deciding to buy a particular house.
方案模式
为了吸引住民,建造公共设施
削弱,削弱方案可行性/可操作性,说明否定性副作用
A、developers将建设设施的花费转化为高房价,把住民推得更远了,付不起房价,方案可行性弱;有力的削弱,CORRECT
B、轻工业带来更多就业机会,无关
C、其他城镇也着手做类似的事情吸引住民(说明它是可行的),增强
D、developers将建造公共设施的成本早就算进总成本里了(意译),具有可操作性,增强
E、一些新买房的人将recreational列为买房重要影响因子,可行性强,增强
have yet to 不是尚未的意思嘛,楼主c选项应该更正为 还没有做这些事情吸引住民,所以是增强的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论