I didn't get the meaning of C at the first time. After simplifying the sentence, it talks about "Whether in the event of ... , the magazine will make the same efforts"
the key is the opposite relation between liberal and conservative book review. The publisher used an example to say that they didn't prefer the liberal views. To evaluate it, we could put questions to the validity of the example. First, they got the conservative review firs but waited for the liberal view and published both. so would they the same thing if they receive the liberal review first?
A属于无关选项
Blue1.8g=7.2q
核心词问题,后面常加加which和a result of
AB还是核心词错了 消费的预期 应该是增长的预期才对
I was stuck in the first bold sentence. justified means reasonable. it said that the investor's sniping is unreasonable. It will be the conclusion.
Attack the assumptions made by the author: the doctors knew who cannot benefited from the surgery before it.
Goal: cut cost
major crops是新的information,assume不是加强,不需要新的information
正常人靠感光调节黑色素,盲人黑色素也能调节改变的话,那说明皮质层不是光线的通道。 如果黑色素水平没有改变,说明一定是光线的通道,因为在这里盲人和正常人唯一不同的是皮质损伤与否,如果带来了另一个改变,黑色素调节与否,说明两者一定有联系。 至于盲人黑色素不调节的情况下怎么维持周期并不在讨论范围内,盲人肯定有其他办法,在这里不需要考虑这个问题。
it 如果在主语位置, 并且身后是不定式、动名词、或者从句时, it是形式主语; 或者用于使役动词身后(make /have/leave等)
错因:忽略了crrent和would not,文章说的是虽然最近来自销售的税收少,但将来怎么这么样,不是相同的时间段。做的时候一直觉得要解释的矛盾是:明明税收少了,怎么还能够给学校相同的钱。
---by ruqi
choice b, 仍然开着的工作室和生产厂今年的工作量减少了。strengthen the conclusion,混淆视线
by---吴美娜
我的理解和老师的讲解有一点偏差:
错选D. 把poverty level和最低工资划了等号,不要脑补
to do只是单纯的表达目的,并不是convert sth to sth的结构
应该修饰gadget,