扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-48
Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the argument?
Aroca County's public schools are supported primarily by taxes on property. The county plans to eliminate the property tax and support schools with a new three percent sales tax on all retail items sold in the county. Three percent of current retail sales is less than the amount collected through property taxes, but implementation of the plan would not necessarily reduce the amount of money going to Aroca County public schools, because ______.
many former Aroca county residents left the county because of its high property taxes
a shopping mall likely to draw shoppers from neighboring counties ,which have much higher sales-tax rates, is about to open in Aroca county
at least some aroca county parents are likely to use the money they will save on property taxes to send their children to private schools not funded by the county
all of the money they that is collected in property taxes currently goes to be the public schools
retailers in aroca county are not likely to absorb the sales tax by reducing the pretax price of their goods
错因：忽略了crrent和would not，文章说的是虽然最近来自销售的税收少，但将来怎么这么样，不是相同的时间段。做的时候一直觉得要解释的矛盾是：明明税收少了，怎么还能够给学校相同的钱。
B:能吸引别国的消费者，这样就能促进销量。（别国销售税高，说明价格更贵，因为商家把税收转移到了顾客身上，这就是为什么免税店东西更便宜的原因，因此能吸引消费者）
E: 无关选项，A县的零售商不会通过降低税前售价的方式来承担销售税。潜台词就是消费者最终付的钱数没有因为tax而增加，原来标价1块钱的东西现在变成0.97块了，付款的时候加上3％的税还是付1块，tax的负担由商家埋单了。这最多能说明新策略后总的销售额不会因为赋税而下降，没法解释为什么总零售税额能达到或超过地产税额这个预期
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论