老师您也说了是由于不定式短语to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets是laws的定语。按照您的解释,law对后面require的约束力很强所以应该用不定式选E啊。 如果按照您说的,主句“遵纪守法”对“法律规定”的发生与否没有任何影响,所以用ing,那就变成探讨compliance with laws对后面的 require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets约束力的问题了。 我认为如果按照老师讲的“不定式和ing区别”知识点,这道题难道不就是看law对后面require的约束力吗,按照老师平时的思路和这个知识点,这道题应该选E???
谓语动词对宾语宾补的约束力
描述法律法规的内容要用ing修饰,因为法令的内容通常以分词引导表效力的延续,如laws、agreement、directive等,但是如果是表法令的目的,就要用to do
整篇文章做的一塌糊涂。。。
endure longer→proportion increase
the main problem with option B is the article "a"
aspirin prevents blood clots just as well as does a commonly used and a more expensive blood-thinning drug
the second "a" kind of implies that there are two drugs rather than one.
(a) is that the modifier "having finished high school" implies that the people have already finished high school by the timeframe of the sentence. in that case you wind up with something that's illogical, because they wouldn't be "students" anymore in that case.
more closely... than
A没留意so...that...中间夹了一个such。 简单题
significant effect中性词,可以是好的影响也可以是坏的影响
Faue: women were marginalized
Gabin:male domination
In proclaiming what she called her "singularity," Cavendish insisted that she was a self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the center of her own subjective universe rather than a satellite orbiting a dominant male planet.
C 没理解清楚句子, by themselves指的是这些activities,这个是说本方案不会产生过大副作用
evidence肯定是一件事儿的证据,而不是一个东西的证据。A的evidence修饰的其实是societies,不成立,应该是societies arise。
如果predicted后面应该接would (not will) 好奇为什么estimated后面接have experience,不是had experienced???
have experienced 表示动词先时性,experienced 这个动作先于estimated 发生,并且已经产生了结果,即sales declines of up to fifty percent,所以不用have been experiencing
简单来说
一个句子同时出现过去时和现在时,可接受
一个句子同时出现现在时和将来时,可接受
一个句子同时出现过去时和将来时,不能接受
栗子
If you go, I will go. 对
If you went, I would go. 对
If you went, I will go. 错
aim at doing 和 aim at sth都可以吧AC 有人能看看是不是patients的问题吗?
doing强调过程,sth强调prevent本身这件事
不是patients的问题,eldly patients 和 the eldly patient 都可以表示一类人
如果用名词prevention的话,整个句子的重心就变了,aim at the prevention 而不是aim at preventing ... (这件事)
而且用名词prevention后面接了of又接了from,容易弱化prevent ... from ... 的意思,这在GMAT考试中,这是不正确的,这种结构通常都没有prevent sth from doing 意思,from更多的是它的本意,来自
举个栗子
This proposal is aimed at the prevention of polution from factories.
This proposal is aimed at preventing factories from polution.
收到!
这几天听了RON的课,他说-tion和-ing的区别有几个:第一个是tion代表的是一个general idea,ing更强调这个动作,第二个是tion一般指那种间接(involved)从事而不是直接从事,第三个是tion是impersonal的,是谁做了这个动作根本不重要,常用在就是一个gernal的说法里(比如讲大道理)。这里说 Medicare was enacted,那么这里明确是有一个enact的人的,所以应该用ing。“THE FOCUS IN ON THE ACTUAL PROCESS, NOT THE GENERAL IDEA”
D 答案中的 it是单数,代不了 90,000 tons
表示时间/重量/钱数....etc. ,都是单数的呀
rc
词语理解错误:compromise妥协危害; one word pass,所以不要只看大意,一定要仔细看每个词的意思,这种陷阱!
They sometimes compromise the accuracy of their findings by collecting and analyzing more information than is strictly required for their trials.与文中矛盾,
a肯定对,就是因为后看的b就选了b,把a的正确性完全忘在脑后,这种错误经常犯:最后看的选项觉得正确,不要忘了和之前很正确的对比斟酌一下,不要脑子一热一冲动(非常容易)就选了后面那个看起来正确的而忘记前面被自己标记的正确的
如果x>0且x0.这里是x>0且y
如果x>0且x0.这里是x>0且y
确实是大市场,可是竞争多了怎么就一定代表会利润上升呢 ...专注于细分市场并不一定比在大市场利润低吧...