Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
题目分析:
本题考生需要看出划线部分身前的their compliance with laws是一个句子的名物化结果,原句为:
They comply with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
选项分析:
A选项:saying身后的宾语从句that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles的主语的核心词是compliance,是一个单数名词,所以该宾语从句的谓语动词也应该是一个单数名词,即,protects。因此,本选项犯了主谓一致的错误。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:主谓一致错误同(A)。
D选项:不定式短语to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets应改为现在分词短语requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets,这点考查了“不定式和ing的区别”,用之于本题,主句“遵纪守法”对“法律规定”的发生与否没有任何影响(你遵守还是不遵守法律,对法律本身规定了什么没有影响),因此只能用ing短语做定语修饰laws;主谓一致错误同(A)。请注意,这里的compliance with laws是comply with laws的名词化形式,所以由于不定式短语to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets是laws的定语,所以它的主句是comply(compliance)。
E选项:不定式短语错误同(D)。
老师您也说了是由于不定式短语to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets是laws的定语。按照您的解释,law对后面require的约束力很强所以应该用不定式选E啊。 如果按照您说的,主句“遵纪守法”对“法律规定”的发生与否没有任何影响,所以用ing,那就变成探讨compliance with laws对后面的 require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets约束力的问题了。 我认为如果按照老师讲的“不定式和ing区别”知识点,这道题难道不就是看law对后面require的约束力吗,按照老师平时的思路和这个知识点,这道题应该选E???
谓语动词对宾语宾补的约束力
描述法律法规的内容要用ing修饰,因为法令的内容通常以分词引导表效力的延续,如laws、agreement、directive等,但是如果是表法令的目的,就要用to do
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论