The first shots of the American Revolution, fired at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts, were, according to legend, heard around the world, but news of these shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another additional eleven days to reach Charleston, South Carolina.
shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another additional eleven days
shots that was sent by swift messenger took four days in order to reach New York City, and also another eleven days
shots that were sent by swift messenger took four days to reach New York City and another eleven days
shots took four days by swift messenger in order to reach New York City and another eleven days in addition
shots took four days by swift messenger to reach New York City and another eleven days
题目分析:
略。
选项分析:
A选项:首先,定语从句which were sent by swift messenger中的谓语动词是复数,所以其先行词必须是复数名词。但在逻辑上,真正被信使送的应该是“新闻”,但news是单数名词,应该用was。
其次,介词短语in reaching New York City需改为不定式短语to reach New York City,这点考查了不定式和ing的区别。用之于本题,in reaching/to reach是宾语的补足语,因此需考虑其主句的谓语动词take的约束力。显然地,本选项中take的约束力较强,因此应该用不定式作为其宾语的补足语。
最后,as well as是副词而不是连词,所以其不能用来连接两个具有对等关系的名词。
B选项:当不定式做宾语补足语时,我们通常直接说to do,而不说in order to do,例如:
My mom forced me to eat lunch.
**My mom forced me in order to eat lunch.
第二个例句是不正确的。
C选项:定语从句中的谓语动词的单复数错误同选项(A)。
D选项:in order to错误同选项(B);another和in addition在语意上重复。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
主语是New不是shots
首先,根据was sent的主语应该是news 排除AC
后面表示并列用 and 且 结构一致 都应用 to reach,排除 BD
而且B中的also D中的 in addition 都跟and 和another 重复,冗余 排除
MARK.
C news是单数 要用was
C & E 在意思上也有slight difference (定语修饰 v.s. 状语)
哇 我真的瓜皮 but后面的是news of 怎么能用were呢!!!
主要的考点:news是单数名词以及in order to在这里的用法不正确
在c跟e之间错选了c
主要是不知道news是单数。
不过c有个定从跳跃修饰的问题,是不是只有非限制性定语从句才能跳跃修饰呢?
另外,e里面的“by swift messenger”前面不应该加一个表被动的was吗?每次看见by就想到被动语态是不是不正确呢?
1. 跳跃修饰和限定性或是非限定性无关。你想,它们都是定语,凭啥有的严格有的不严格呢?很多时候的跳跃修饰是“无奈”之举,当一个名词必须有两个定语,且均需要是后置定语的时候,它们自然只能顺序排在后面。这就造成了跳跃修饰,和考点无关。
2. 是的。by可以引导方式状语啊,只有被动语态身后加by才能是逻辑主语呢,咱不能颠倒因果。
一下就懂了,谢谢老师!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
限定性定语从句可以跳跃修饰嘛?
(B)news of these shots that was sent by swift messenger took four days
took的动作发起者是不是歧义?(news/messenger)
能否当成错误原因?
千万不可以。我们要按照语法读句子,不是按照我们认为的事情读句子~这个句子中的 that was sent by swift messenger是明显的定语从句,took的主语也是非常准确的news。
这个定语从句就近原则应该修饰shots啊 为什么是news呢
因为是 was 主语一定是单数;news不可数名词,用单数
shots是复数名词,所以that was一定不是修饰shots
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
as well as 的涵义是“还有”、“不但。。而且。。”重点在as well as前面的部分而不在后面的部分
选项A as well as 使用不当,前后不平行,并且根据were说明指代的是shots 但逻辑上却应该指代news
选项B 限制性定语从句导致了意思变成了被信使所转送的新闻!。in order to 多余。 also和another重复
选项C 限制性定语从句错误同B news 应当用was
选项D in order to同B another 和addition重复
news单数,主谓一致排除AC。 In addition 重复,排除D。B里面的that修饰news,但是and前后不平行。吧。。。