It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise
It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and under her command it had won high praise
Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command
Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command
Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command
c. having won 的逻辑主语不是kg
a. 2个 “it was ……that ……”强调句并列
there is an EXCEPTION to the principle that a pronoun must stand for an actual noun.
here is that exception:
in the construction
it is/was ADJ that...
or
it is/was ADV that...
or
it is/was ADVERB PHRASE that...
the "it" DOES NOT have to stand for an actual noun.
note that the "THAT" after the adjective/adverb/adverb phrase is absolutely necessary.
请问helr E到底错在哪里呢
提问,我能明白BCDE有明显缺陷,但是对于A选项,It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers ”中that后面的it,并没有明确的指代对象。虽然文中提到了The Washington Post ,但它前面加了of作为publisher的定语出现(相当于形容词),并不算名词。这样的指代允许吗?
it只能指代报社。第一个it为强调句式固有用法,不指代任何实质成分。KG为人,publisher为人,it不能指代。剩下的只有报社。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A 强调句并列
B had won无明显的过去完成时态标志
C having won的主语变成了KG,实际上是newspaper won
D 无谓语动词
E Moving和won不具由同时性,moving无法作伴随修饰won。
E错在
The second part described something that happened later. Not something that happened as the WP was "moving into the first rank of xxxx".
E.g.,
Arriving in Seoul for the first time, I was confused by the addresses, which had no apparent relationship to street names.
"”> I was confused when I first arrived in Seoul.
B: it had won 时态与前一句不平行;
C:having won 修饰it move into first rank,二者之间没有因果关系
D: winning high prize 没有谓语
E: moving into 修饰won high praise, 二者之间应该是并列关系,不是修饰关系。
E 错表示在moving和主句同时发生
这应该是and连接两个强调句It was ... that ..., and it was ....under her command that.....强调的部分都是在句子作状语成分,一个是became publisher,另外一个是under her command
b.had done时态不对, 因为Katharine Graham's becoming,her没有指代对象
c that不能指代句子,而且having表完成,应该是先排名第一再得奖
d 没有谓语动词
e 也是her的问题
E "moving" and "becoming" indicate something that's going on right now - this should be in the past. And "after Katherine Graham's becoming its publisher" is horrible.
E 错在,KG's becoming。
曼哈顿里说动词优于形容词优于名词,sb‘s doing一般是错的。
e错的原因是因为名词所有格不可以单独拿来指代,换一句话说,名词所有格不是名词。所以her可以拿来指代非名词的所有格
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
为什么选E? 因为句子是平行关系?如何判断?
it is...that ... 并列强调句
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E错是因为没有反映出来强调的语气吗?还是因为moving和won high praise在时间上不相近?
动名词作伴随状语一般都暗含动作的先后性,虽然它的时态跟随主句时态,但是如果动名词放在前半句,暗示这个动作是先发生,如果放在后面暗含结果伴随,这里应该是没有这种动作的先后逻辑性,强调的应该是并列的两件事情。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
e到底怎么了。。。。。
A'S becoming its 不觉得很wordy 吗
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
e到底怎么了。。。。。
选项E,是否可以理解,一个伴随状语中不能出现2个先后发生的动作?即,moving into....和 KG becoming its publisher,....
E选项?
属于idiom错误吗?after Katharine Gramham's becoming 看着不太对劲,对吗?
E选项的错误在于her无指代,对吗?
不是对unrelenting report的需求,而是因为unrelenting report受到高度赞扬
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B是错在had won的时态问题吗?becoming有没有错误?
B uses past perfect incorrectly (simple past for "it was only after" and past perfect for "it had won high praise" which comes later chronologically than when KG became publisher) https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/katharine-graham-t2120.html
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论