Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
把结论找错了所以很容易就选择错误
和核心推理无关的部分都才被称为是背景
B:a state of affairs把the second boldface定义为fact,然而分明是claim,即consideration
the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread——这个明显不是fact
Thus句子正是那个被驳斥的prediction哪
重点在于boldface与论点,反论点的逻辑关系
注意体会这两个boldface之间有明显的对立关系!
The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome
这句话到底该怎么理解呢?有没有好心人帮忙翻译一下?
The first is not context (or background) - it is a premise used to draw a conclusion. The second is not the main point of view but a contrasting point of view.
纠结了很久,这句句子的Main conclusion到底是thus这句还是However这句。。
事实证明了,我想多了。
看关键引导词(thus)就好了,不用太考虑意义。
黑脸1是thus句子的前提;黑脸2是反对thus句子;而thus句子就是一个prediction
错选A,黑脸2其实包含了文章的结论,但主要错误点在对黑脸1的解释,不要臆断。
和核心推理无关的部分都可以被称为是背景,Mark下~
那么这句话的main conclusion是thus后吗。。大神来讲讲吧
however前与作者意见相反,排除ADE
however后与作者意见相同,排除B
错选A,第一个黑体字不是背景,而是给出了一个seeds的缺点。和核心推理无关的部分都才被称为是背景。
A) The first is not context (or background) - it is a premise used to draw a conclusion. The second is not the main point of view but a contrasting point of view. (This one also implies the two are on the same side of the fence and they are not!)
还是不太懂这道题,第一次就直接把BC排除了
为什么A是错的呢?
这题求解答,除了论点之外的句子,应该都是可以称作背景的吧。在AC中犹豫了半天,总要找一个总结句吧,只能是第二个黑体了,结果错了。