A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is a consideration that has been raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.
The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.
The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.
The first is an assumption, rejected by the argument, that has been used to justify a course of action; the second presents that course of action.
The first is a consideration that has been used to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presents a course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.
这个题目是不是有误?第一个黑体明显和第二个黑体的关系是对立的,不是支持的,C说不通啊?
答案是C,explain the appeal of a certain strategy 并不是在支持,而是在解释;这个与B中的support the strategy that the argument recommends 是两码事。
不是关系对立。第二个是第一个的低配版。也就是一个不那么极端的方案。因此第一处是可以解释这个方案出现的原因(即使这个原因引导的是一个更极端的方案),第二个是方案(从极端版变到柔和版之间还经历了一个非划线部分)
是不是感觉哪里都有我233333
。。。相对应的,不也是哪里都有我?!!!~
同意!!!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论