扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-102
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training.
even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations.
many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations.
after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth .
even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth.
（继续笔记）
要关注的点是：为什么那些国家会发生经济增长这件事。
以下只是我的笔记：（求开发添加笔记功能！！！）
P：施行环保规定会减慢经济增长 FACT：有最严格环保规定的州经济增长最快。
C：不能由上面那个事实推出环保规定可以促进经济增长。
gap:不能吧相关事件当成因果关系
削弱——经济增长是由其他原因造成的
经济增长促进了环保规定
果因推理直接补出因？直接证明两者没有关系（他因有关）除了a之外bcde全是证明两个有关系的，排
因果间接
education和job training不属于economic类，C、E虽然也在反驳fact的观点，但依然是在说economic