As part of major renovations to Flowertown's Main Street train station, consultants to the train company proposed moving the station's entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and then leasing the high-rent entrance space to retail businesses. In that way, the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the consultants' proposal?
More train commuters are employed in businesses located on Main Street than in businesses located on the adjoining side street.
A reliable survey of Flowertown's commuters showed that virtually none of them would use the train any less frequently if the station's entrance were moved.
The high-rent block of Flowertown's Main Street includes several buildings whose owners currently seek to replace long-standing tenants lost in recent months.
If the station's entrance were moved, the train company would need to begin costly renovations to its Main Street entrance space.
Ridership on Flowertown trains declined only slightly from 1970 to 1985 while other train companies lost large numbers of commuters.
Plan: 把目前在M街上的车站主门移到另外一条街上, 再把M接上的空位租给零售商赚租金 Goal:在不影响财政收入的情况下支付车站改造的费用
choice a,M街上的火车通勤者人数比另一条街上的通勤者多。irrelevant,不要脑补车站换了门,原来M街上的通勤者因此就不去坐车了
choice b,调查显示如果换门,通勤者不会受到影响更少坐车。correct,车站的ridership 收入不会因此减少
choice c,M街上几个大楼正在寻找租户。weaken
choice d,如果大门搬走,就要花钱进行昂贵的翻新. weaken
choice e, irrelevant
错选A 真是想多了hhh
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
方案模式,入口从高租金(主街)往低租金(边上)移动,对 tight budget没坏影响
增强,方案可行性/可操作性/否定性副作用弱三选一
A、主街人流量大,通勤者多,即有副作用,削弱
B、入口移动对通勤没影响,无否定性副作用,CORRECT
C、包租婆寻找长期租客,与入口移动无关
D、移动入口花的更多,budget雪上加霜,削弱
E、通勤者受另一家公司影响减少,与入口移动无关
手段,入口从高租金(主街)往低租金(边上)移动,对 tight budget没坏影响
增强,手段用了比没用好、副作用弱
A、主街人流量大,通勤者多,削弱
B、入口移动对通勤没影响,CORRECT
C、包租婆寻找长期租客,与入口移动无关
D、移动入口花的更多,budget雪上加霜,削弱
E、1970-1985的事儿,不知所云
加强方案可行性 ,目标pay rent easily 并且without negative impact on its tight budget.B选项说明了不会影响收入。strengthen
方案:从主街道移到旁边的街道 目标:pay rent easily 并且对预算没有坏的影响
b选项巴士乘客数量不会减少,因此不会影响收入 strengthen
错选d weaken
不是方案推理吧?题目中不是说了方案可以了吗?有结论啊。
是因果推理吗?
因为移到后面可以把前面的租出去
所以可以省钱并且没有副作用。
CQ2:因本身没问题,因的特性变化不会导致果变
CQ1:因果联系没问题。有因有果没因没果化。
moving the station's entrance is a part of major renovation.
"In that way,the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations"
those = moving the station's entrance
Choice D negates the mentioned information, so it is wrong.
没看清Support. 选项CD都是在weaken, 反了。C- 主要商业街上有其它的owner, 所以竞争有可能让租金下降,导致收入下降; D-搬出来需要costly renovation, 也是收入下降~~
costly renovation是收入下降???更贵的翻新装修
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
两个改变:转移车站入口、将原高租金入口出租。相比原先一味的资金输出,后者将可能为公司输入资金;而转移车站入口带来三种可能——使用火车人流减少、不变、增多,第一种可能性存在负面影响,后两者与B选项不谋而合。
方案推理
方案可行性问题,B,改变出入口不影响客流量