扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2008E1-SC-179
Unlike George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980, both of whom running as independent candidates, H. Ross Perot's independent run for the presidency in 1992 arose not from an unsuccessful effort to gain a major party nomination but from a desire to establish a viable third party in American politics.
George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980, both of whom running as independent candidates,
George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980, each of whom ran as independent candidates,
George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980, both of which ran as an independent candidate,
the independent candidates, George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980,
the independent candidacies of George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980,
题目分析：
本题十分简单，其利用比较词unlike来考查其连接两者可比的特点。请注意，Independent run for the presidency表示“独立竞选总统职位”，在意思上等同于independent candidacy。
选项分析：
A选项：Unlike连接两者为George Wallace in 1968 and John Anderson in 1980和H. Ross Perot's independent run，不能用人和职位比较；both of whom引导非限定性定语从句，其中必须有谓语动词，而running是分词，不能做谓语。
B选项：Unlike连接两者不对等错误同选项(A)；each和independent candidates单复数不一致。
C选项：Unlike连接两者不对等错误同选项(A)；an independent candidate和both单复数不一致；由于both of which ran as an independent candidate的先行词是人，所以应将which改为who。
D选项：the independent candidates依然是“人”，其使得Unlike连接两者不对等。
E选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
D。candidates 候选人，申请人
E。 candidacies 候选资格，候选状态
E选项我也是把candidacies看成了candidates,直接排除了。。。
这道题确实很简单，但却是一个小而精的陷阱，特别是在时间压力下。我错在，candidates 和candidancies长得很像，并且先入为主的觉得后面的句子主干是人，自然觉得E的of结构是有问题的，直接就选了D。 引以为戒，引以为戒！！！
我也是
一模一样！！！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
限非限或者换位运算