Mideast immigrants' rates of entrepreneurship exceed virtually every other immigrant group in the increasingly diverse United States economy.
Mideast immigrants' rates of entrepreneurship exceed
Mideast immigrants are exhibiting rates of entrepreneurship exceeding
Immigrants from the Mideast exhibit rates of entrepreneurship exceeding those of
The rates of entrepreneurship in immigrants from the Mideast exceed
The rates of Mideast immigrants' entrepreneurship exceeds those of
exhibit:显示
rate of entrepreneurship:创业率
来自中东的移民显示,在日益多元化的美国经济中,企业家的创业率超过了几乎所有其他移民群体
those 指代rates (of entrepreneurship)
看见 E有 those of 就直接选了,根本没看见前面明晃晃的exceeds
做SC千万不能为了节省时间跳读!!!
依旧是比较题,我看到比较题就容易大脑宕机,不要慌,盆友!一步步来分析
首先分析比较的对象,这要求去理解句意,不是移民团体本身,而是在比较不同移民团体中的企业家的比率,所以后面肯定得有个修饰语表达其他移民团体的企业家比率,由此排除A,B,D
比较C和E,the rates做subject,verb应该plural,exceeds错误,排除E
copied from cd:
首先从句子的意思来看的话,是:在美国,Mideast和其他group的企业家比率的比较。
因为两者比较的话,对象不一致的话一定不能少了that/those of等,所以直接锁定了C和E。
B:in this version, "exceeding virtually every other immigrant group" is written as a modifier that is modifying "rates of entrepreneurship". therefore, you have a comparison between rates on the one hand and immigrant groups on the other hand -- a nonsense comparison.
"those" stands for "rates of entrepreneurship", not just "rates".
"Mideast immigrants" is wrong; "immigrants from the Mideast" is better. ("Mideast" can't be used as an adjective of nationality, for the same reason you can't say "Asia people" in place of "people from Asia".)
我想问下,those of every other...,用that 替代those可以吗? those会不会有点不妥啊
rates是复数,复数指代吧
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E 中两个错误:1. 主谓不一致,exceeds->exceed
2. 对比不一致,前半句是the rates of Mideast immigrants' entrepreneurship, 重点是entrepreneurship, 后半句是those (rates) of every other immigrant group ,重点是group
E:由于主谓不一致,the rates与exceeds主谓不一致。而且E中的对比不合适,the rates of Mideast immigrants' entrepreneurship 与 those of [the rates of] every other immigrant group 对比。即of后的对象不一致,一个是entrepreneurship,另一个是immigrant group
正解
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这类题我的错误率大概100%。。。。也是醉了
摘自CD:
C:Immigrants from the Mideast exhibit 【rates of entrepreneurship [exceeding those of virtually every other immigrant group]】 in the increasingly diverse United States economy.
C中的exceeding起到一个Modifier的作用,对rates of entrepreneurship的修饰;同时those指代的是前面的rates of entrepreneurship,正确的对比了Mideast与other group的rates。如果改成exceed的话,那么句中就有两个动词了。
使用双重所有格,错误;主谓不一致:主语是rates,谓语应该用exceed.
the rates of immigrants’ 表达错误, 应该改为the rates of immigrant或者 immigrants’ rates
in general, "X's rate of Y" is preferred to "the rate of X's Y".
for instance, salesman X's rate of success is better than the rate of salesman X's success.
"Mideast immigrants" is wrong; "immigrants from the Mideast" is better. ("Mideast" can't be used as an adjective of nationality, for the same reason you can't say "Asia people" in place of "people from Asia".)
主谓不一致。。
被以前惯例害的:下意识认为n +doing 做定语只能修饰前面最先出现的名词;
exceed逻辑主体平行排除ad,e应该在other后面加entrepreneurship,exhibit逻辑主语应该是immigrants排除b
句义,中东移民在美国成为企业家的比率比其他地方的移民在美国成为企业家的比率都高;A:rateVS group,比较对象有误;B:比较对象有误,后半句应当加exceed.... are,且 mideast不能做形容词形容immigrant,同理,asia people也不对,应该说 people from asia; C正确;D:比较对象有误;E主谓不一致,且the rates of mideast immigrants's entrepreneurship 不如 mideast immigrant's rates of entrepreneurship.
注册了个账号来DISS 你, 瞎几把解释 exhibt还是exceed根本不是考点 只有E和C平行 E主谓不一致,所以选C。
满嘴胡言乱语的人 害了多少单纯网友
????????
我怎么觉得人家说的有道理呢,我是没看出来哪里考平行了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
展现出了比XXX比率更高的比率
答案c中的those 是不是等于 rates of entrepreneurship ,而不是 rates ?
其实rates of entrepreneurship 的核心词还是rates,说到底还是两个rates进行的比较
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E选项除了主谓不一致的问题以外,【The rates of Mideast immigrants' entrepreneurship】没有错误吧?
单说这个短语,肯定是没有问题的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论