扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / DaQuan-SC-2214
The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
错选e
这句话的意思是xxx的增值导致了法令的通过，而非xxx的增值导致了法令，故排除e
with the intent of doing sth
intent to do
intent on doing/sth
都对
Wrong: The results of the company's cost- cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.
Its指代the company，it指代the company，company不会fall，是profits fall，句子逻辑错误
B，against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell them later，
they sell them，到底是谁sell谁？指代不清，有歧义
语义：域名抢注会导致….，造成…
语法：
D选项：原句强调的是颁布法案后带来的伴随结果，and连接表示两件独立事件，不符合句意。排除；
E选项：and allowing没有平行对象。排除
A选项：对比BE，强调名词用passing，没有passage纯名词好。排除
C选项：in 1999放置位置在句中，有歧义。排除
答案是C啊 不是A啊登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
更多的是考虑which的就近修饰，C比B减少了which修饰的歧义。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B.in 1999修饰语位置不对，主要用于modify passage，而非act。
→prep笔记：其次，of doing 用于修饰名词，to do 修饰动词，with the intent that they will sell复杂
（这部分我保留意见）
D、E：句意扭曲，proliferation led to passage not the ACT!→meaning
intend that
intend to do/doing
* "the intent that they will..." is unidiomatic. intent后面加从句unidiomatic
* the "which" erroneously refers to "1999".
b, in 1999修饰歧义同a, they的指代对象不清，前面的复数名词太多
c, 句子主干是proliferation led to the act， and it allows...这里it语法上指代proliferation，但是实际指代act
e, passed和allowing的逻辑主语是谁？如果是伴随状语，逻辑主语是proliferation，如果是修饰act，逻辑主语就是act，所以两个非谓语动词用逗号隔开，没有紧跟修饰对象，会有歧义
(B) in 1999位置不对,导致修饰不清;with the sole intent that they will sell表达复杂,笨拙.
(C) 正确, lead to the passage强调了结果;which非限定定语从句修饰Act,意思表达清楚;时间状语in 1999紧靠修饰对象the passage,修饰无歧意;用of selling修饰名词intent表达正确
intent of登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论