扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2008E1-SC-218
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
movies—less than those
movies—fewer than have been
movies, which is less than those
movies, a number lower than the people
movies, fewer than the ones
题目分析：
略。
选项分析：
A选项：由于比较对象是“人”，而人是可数名词，因此less than（用于不可数名词）应改为fewer than。代词those的指代对象是people，比较对象没有问题。
B选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。另外，本题用fewer than those也没有问题。
C选项：定语从句which is less than those killed by bee stings，其在字面上会就近修饰名词，即，the man-eater of the movies，逻辑有误。less than错误同选项(A)。
D选项：比数量应该用fewer than而不是lower than，数量只有多少，没有高低。
E选项：代词the ones指代有误。这个代词通常用于指代前面出现过的一堆人或物种的几个，例如：
I planted a lot of roses in my garden. The ones in white I like the best.
例句中的the ones指代的是a lot of roses中的几朵。在本题中，显然同一群人不可能即被鲨鱼咬死又被蜜蜂咬死。
考察：
可数名词修饰用fewer；排除acd
be错选e
代词the ones指代有误。这个代词通常用于指代前面出现过的一堆人或物种的几个，例如：
I planted a lot of roses in my garden. The ones in white I like the best.
Choice E: 代词the ones指代有误。这个代词通常用于指代前面出现过的一堆人或物种的几个，例如：
I planted a lot of roses in my garden. The ones in white I like the best.
例句中的the ones指代的是a lot of roses中的几朵。在本题中，显然同一群人不可能即被鲨鱼咬死又被蜜蜂咬死。
ron： first, i'm about 99% sure that we are not allowed to use "ones" to refer to people.
second, i'm also about 99% sure that "THE ones" must refer back to "THE some other noun".
第二次做对了开心，人可数名词，less than错误。B正确，省略了people。Cwhich引导的定语从句就近修饰前边的movies，不合理，无法跳跃修饰，太远啦。D a number数量没有高低，有大小，多少。Ethe ones指代前面出现过的一堆人或物的一种，逻辑意思不OK
老旧题目，弃！
one可以指同物也可以指异物，如：
After walking by the chocolates so many times, Roger finally had to eat one.
Your dictionary is more useful than the one my uncle gave me.
one可以指人，如：The students who are most successful are usually the ones who come to all the classes. 成绩最好的学生往往是出全勤的那些。
the ones 代词
形容人只能用fewer 排除ACD选项
E选项：比较中不能用the ones，因为the ones表示整体中的一部分
B选项：have been与前面平行，than后面省略了those
冒号/破折号：
冒号表示列举、解释或说明，前面必须是完整的句子；冒号解释说明前面某部分或整个句子；冒号离被解释的部分越近越好
破折号意义更为广泛；不用紧跟被修饰部分；前面不需要是一个完整的句子
one/the one指与前面提到过的东西同类别的东西，不等于前物
Your dictionary is more useful than the one my uncle gave me.
Don’t buy the expensive apples; get the cheaper ones.
ron： first, i'm about 99% sure that we are not allowed to use "ones" to refer to people.
second, i'm also about 99% sure that "THE ones" must refer back to "THE some other noun".
所以those可省略？
ron： first, i'm about 99% sure that we are not allowed to use "ones" to refer to people.
second, i'm also about 99% sure that "THE ones" must refer back to "THE some other noun".
number没有高低之有多少 只能用fewer
those可以省略
注意看时态的parallelism
指代问题
做完很多prep 08的题并详细研究prep08的语法笔记，发现prep08语法题与现在的语法题有很大出入了。比如说which的就近指代，后置定语的就近指代，在prep08中都是可以跳跃修饰的。这在og16和17中前所未有，OG中140道题我每道题都做了笔记，每个选项都做了细致分析，没有发现一道有跨越修饰的题。且句子工整，非常完美，一点毛病挑不出来。所以说，还是要以OG为主，OG才是最具有发言权的东西。一定要重视OG！做题数量不等于质量！prep与现在的年代久远，很多考点与现在的语法题都有出入（我个人见解），只能作为参考。比如这道题中的比较省略现象，在og16和17所有比较题型中都没有出现过。说明OG已经不推荐这种用法了。朋友们要自行评估，自行思考！
说得很对，模考主要用来锻炼心态和速度。
这道题也在GWD里面呀.... 虽然不知道是不是因为题太旧了， 但是毕竟也是考过的。。。
同意，新的og几乎都是完美对称的，跳跃修饰也是几乎没有的，只有that 修饰了In的短的介词短语前面的名词，其余全部都是就近修饰，还有专门考就近修饰的。。比较也从来没有这种省略了those直接加have been的比较...都是很准确的比较
！！！我居然没有早点发现，真的被各种比较的省略搞的很懵。。
og没有跳跃修饰？见过那道“gusty westerly wind”吗
OG2018-SC-778 that 的跳跃修饰
我也觉得A选项把those省略实在是很奇怪，搞死了。
Ron的有些解释也不全对，不知道到底要怎么去积累知识点了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
代词the ones指代有误。这个代词通常用于指代前面出现过的一堆人或物种的几个，例如：
I planted a lot of roses in my garden. The ones in white I like the best.
例句中的the ones指代的是a lot of roses中的几朵。在本题中，显然同一群人不可能即被鲨鱼咬死又被蜜蜂咬死。
如果是5 gallons 或者5 dollars 用less than，所以A错误
我记得以前有说插入语要么两边都用逗号，要么都用破折号。上来就直接把ab排除了
对的，og19里面有一道dash的题，就是说插入语两边必须都是一样的符号，要么是逗号，要么是破折号、、、
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
in the correct answer, we have "have been killed by x" and "have been killed by y".
perfect.
you really aren't going to do any better than that!
in the choice with "those killed by bee stings" -- note that we don't have "people killed by the great white shark" in the other part.
when you consider parallel constructions, your main goal is just to pick the choice with the best parallelism.
if you were a writer, then you would need all kinds of subtle intuition about this kind of thing -- because writers don't get multiple-choice options!
but you get multiple-choice options, so we needn't complicate the issue any more than necessary.
“if you were a writer, then you would need all kinds of subtle intuition about this kind of thing -- because writers don't get multiple-choice options!”
That part of the quote is just awesome;)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论