Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.
Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore
When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he
Since he was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, so Charles Lindbergh
Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh
Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh
题目分析:略
选项分析:
A选项:此句出现了两个完整的句子,即“CL was reluctant to have...”和“he refused to carry...”。两个完整的句子之间必须有连词,句号或者分号隔开。逗号是不可以连接两个完整的句子的。
B选项:When引导的状语从句修饰主句谓语动词“refused to carry”的发生时间;being reluctant是伴随状语,即简化的状语从句,也修饰了主句的谓语动词。此时,这个句子的主句(CL拒绝带东西)有两个并列的状语从句(1.当他正在飞的时候;2. 不愿意多加一点重量),但很明显这是不合逻辑的。我们不能说他“正在飞”的时候拒绝带东西,拒绝带东西一定是在他飞之前就已经发生的动作。
C选项:since和so都是连词,两个带着连词的句子,使得整句话没有主句。
D选项:整句话的主语是“being reluctant to carry weight”这件事,之后是系表结构“was the reason”,之后是reason的同位语。此时整句话的核心意思为“不情愿加重量 是 原因”。但核心意思应该说出CL做了什么事,而不仅仅是 “XX是原因”。
E选项:正确。“when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight” 是 “be reluctant” 的时间状语从句,意为“当他试飞的时候,他是不愿意加重的”。“very reluctant to have...” 又作为伴随状语修饰主句“CL refused to carry... ”,此时 “不愿意加重” 和 “拒绝带东西” 有逻辑关系。
应该是他先不情愿,后拒绝。
A两个完整句之间没有连词
being very reluctant表示同时性,指他在拒绝的同时不情愿有额外的重量。没必要
密切关注D选项,容易想错意思
A是两个单独的句子,中间没有连词,therefore不是连词,是个副词。B是两个状语从句,一个when引导的,一个伴随,都修饰逐句,意思不对。
选成了D,但是从逻辑意思上看,E更合理一些
A:however 、 then 、 therefore 、 in addition 都是副词不作连词用——如何判断这些词是属于副词而不是连词呢?
however应该是可以当连词
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
两个状语从句修饰时,需要留心
当想用being+adj的时候 一定要先去想一下是不是有更好的表达方式==》定语从句 / v-ed / 直接的adj修饰 / 同位语修饰
① , despite being offered $1,000 to do so.《==注意看 显然这个修饰需要main clause的主语直接就是那个人
②since so存在语义重复
③you should avoid "being" when expressing the IDENTITY or CHARACTERISTICS of some individual or thing.
otherwise, evaluate it on the same merits as you would any other verb
注意:however 、 then 、 therefore 、 in addition 都是副词不作连词用
you should avoid "being" when expressing the IDENTITY or CHARACTERISTICS of some individual or thing.
otherwise, evaluate it on the same merits as you would any other verb
D
this usage creates a nonsense construction.
the reason that lindbergh refused... implies that lindbergh said "no" to a reason ("refused a reason"). that doesn't make sense.
Nobody knows the reason why xxxxx happens (worse)
Nobody knows why xxxxx happens (better)
xxxx happens, but nobody knows the reason why (worse)
xxxx happens, but nobody knows the reason (better)
xxxx happens, but nobody knows why (better)
不能carry weight 只能have weight
请问为什么呢?
carry weight 携带重量, 这个说法很奇怪啊。。应该是不想携带更多的邮件或者不想携带行李。
Have weight 有重量,这个相对要通顺一些。
你可以想一下,重量是一个物体本身的一个属性,我们只能说携带物体,拥有重量,而不能说携带重量,因为我们携带的是物体,所以才导致拥有的重量增加。
还有啊 字典里 carry weight好像专门指对某事有影响,而不是指携带重量。
所以,还是have weight更合适。
好!!讲得很清楚!~~谢谢啦!!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A ‘for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight’原因状语 not make sense 应该是时间状语比较reasonable
B 'When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight,' &'being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane'两个独立的状语 分开修饰主句 语义上后者应该 作时间状语 修饰前者
C since... so 明显wordy
比较好奇 D 错在哪儿 还有E 伴随可以省略being???
E ’Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane...'前面不用加being 咩
A 没有连词
B主语he前面修饰语有两句,主语放在两句之中不容易有歧义,不优.being啰嗦
C since so重复
D reason 后应用why.主语太长 不优
D是the reason that应该是the reason why吗???!
B为什么不对啊,为什么不要being?
老师,D中 “was the reason that" 是错误的嘛?