扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / DaQuan-SC-4411
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
monkfish是单数名词，不能用them，their指代，所以E错
if "fish" is singular, it must be used WITH AN ARTICLE ("a", "the", etc.)
i saw a fish swimming beneath me --> singular (1 fish)
i saw fish swimming beneath me --> plural (multiple fish)
句意想表达的是原因，e选项的形式是结果但其实又在表达原因所以很奇怪
d/e. unlike比较双方不可比
B选项错误，对比了legal limits 和cod or haddock。
C选项错误，which只能指代位于它之前的名词monkfish，这样一来句意不对，应该是circumstance contributes to depletion，而不是monkfish contributes to depletion
D选项错误，同B
E选项错误，their指代不明，且对比对象不能对应。
like a，B v c 结构需要严格遵循
1. like/unlike A, S.V.O. 中S与A一定要可比，绝对对称。
2. which/it不能指代一句话，常用同位结构进行替换，例如可以使用discovery/fact等名词总结一句话
3. limit的固定搭配:
4. Unlike 后面只加名词。
一群monkfish登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
说说我的理解：E项主句是there be主系表结构，后面contributing肯定不能表示伴随，而是作adj修饰前面的名词monkfish。但语义错误，并不是某种鱼导致了depletion，而是捕鱼这种情况（circumstance）。此外，E项里都已经有contribute to 了，“导致了。。。” 后面再用because确实多此一举了。
懂了呢，谢谢~，后来我看曼哈顿语法书里说unlike后不能引导从句，所以E中unlike也是错的，对不？
嗯，确实没见过引导从句的
那么 A 中的 “a circumstance ” 这句做什么成分？？
“a circumstance ”是同位语
请问为什么主系表后面不能跟伴随呢？登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
所有选项中Unlike的比较对象前后不是同类型事物，都是错误的，且Because引导的原因状语过于累赘。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论