Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland. Accordingly, Suriland’s wheat farmers are required to sell their crop to the government, which pays them a dollar per bushel less than the price on the world market. Therefore, if the farmers could sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more, less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Suriland’s wheat farmers have higher production costs than do farmers in many other wheat- producing countries.
Sale of a substantial proportion of Suriland’s wheat crop on the world market would probably depress the price of wheat.
The transportation and brokerage costs that Suriland’s farmers would face if they sold their wheat outside Suriland could amount to almost a dollar per bushel.
Suriland is surrounded by countries that do not import any wheat.
The price of a bushel of wheat on the world market occasionally drops below the average cost of producing a bushel of wheat in Suriland.
C说在自由市场中卖的成本估计要达到$1,
而题干中说自由市场价格比本国政府价格高$1
这样不就相互抵消了,那么在自由市场卖就没有意义了
题目的“less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay” ,这里less是介词,意为”减去,不计“,所以它是在已经减去这些成本的情况下多赚一美元,这些成本刚好一美元也就对它多赚多少没有影响
谢谢~所以真的是在为难我555,理解错题意
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论