Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland. Accordingly, Suriland’s wheat farmers are required to sell their crop to the government, which pays them a dollar per bushel less than the price on the world market. Therefore, if the farmers could sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more, less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Suriland’s wheat farmers have higher production costs than do farmers in many other wheat- producing countries.
Sale of a substantial proportion of Suriland’s wheat crop on the world market would probably depress the price of wheat.
The transportation and brokerage costs that Suriland’s farmers would face if they sold their wheat outside Suriland could amount to almost a dollar per bushel.
Suriland is surrounded by countries that do not import any wheat.
The price of a bushel of wheat on the world market occasionally drops below the average cost of producing a bushel of wheat in Suriland.
即使世界市场上价格下降,政府不依然比世界市场的价格少1美元吗?不理解为啥选b
B项相当于是让结论不一定成立的干扰因吧,这里结论是“他们能多赚一美元(相对于在国内)”,感觉还是翻译的问题,这里make a dollar more就是“多赚”的意思,但是如果农民的小麦涌向世界市场导致供大于求,压低市价,最后的结果可能是入不敷出,赚不赚都是问题了,讨论的可能就是少亏一美元的事了。
也不知道我这角度靠不靠谱,最近CR贼迷~
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论