扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-19
Banker: My country’s laws require every bank to invest in its local community by lending money to local businesses, providing mortgages for local home purchases, and so forth. This is intended to revitalize impoverished local communities. But it is clear that the law will soon entirely cease to serve its intended purpose. An increasing number of banks incorporated in our country exist solely on the Internet and are not physically located in any specific community.
The banker’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?
It overlooks the possibility that most banks that are physically located in specific communities in the banker’s country are not located in impoverished communities.
It takes for granted that a law that ceases to serve its originally intended purpose no longer serves any other beneficial purpose, either.
It confuses a condition that would, if present, be likely to produce a given effect, with a condition that would probably be the cause if that effect were present.
It overlooks the possibility that even if there is a strong correlation between two phenomena, neither of those phenomena are necessarily causally responsible for the other.
It fails to adequately address the possibility that an increase in the number of banks of one kind in the banker’s country will not lead to the complete elimination of banks of another kind.
题目：银行家的观点是，以前银行都是实体的，法律要求每个银行投资银行所在地的商业，但是现在网银越来越多，这些网银没有实体（是虚拟的），所以这条法律很快就会完全失效。
反驳： E 过于绝对。意思就是说虽然网银越来越多，但是实体银行只要存在，那么这条法律就不会没用。
A 大多数实体银行并不是设在穷地。无关
B 丧失原本初衷的法律也不再有其他的有益目的。无关
C It confuses a condition ... with a condition...。 混淆两种情况。a condition that would, if present, be likely to produce a given effect = 如果网银出现，那么很有可能使得法律失效。 a condition that would probably be the cause if that effect were present. 如果法律失效，那么很有可能是因为网银出现。意思就是说两个事件有因果关系。但是题目的重点，不在因果，而在结论下得太绝对（entirely）。
D 即便两种现象关联紧密，但是也不一定就是因果关系。还是在说因果。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论