Banker: My country’s laws require every bank to invest in its local community by lending money to local businesses, providing mortgages for local home purchases, and so forth. This is intended to revitalize impoverished local communities. But it is clear that the law will soon entirely cease to serve its intended purpose. An increasing number of banks incorporated in our country exist solely on the Internet and are not physically located in any specific community.
The banker’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?
It overlooks the possibility that most banks that are physically located in specific communities in the banker’s country are not located in impoverished communities.
It takes for granted that a law that ceases to serve its originally intended purpose no longer serves any other beneficial purpose, either.
It confuses a condition that would, if present, be likely to produce a given effect, with a condition that would probably be the cause if that effect were present.
It overlooks the possibility that even if there is a strong correlation between two phenomena, neither of those phenomena are necessarily causally responsible for the other.
It fails to adequately address the possibility that an increase in the number of banks of one kind in the banker’s country will not lead to the complete elimination of banks of another kind.
这个与因果没有关系,这里本来就是想让你预测网银出现的现象的结果,并没有涉及到说问你法律失效的原因
反而有问题的在于这个entire
给你一个insight,如果是比这个更明显一点的题:要思考到绝对的表达在这个推断中扮演的作用
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论