Recent observations suggest that small, earthlike worlds form a very low percentage of the planets orbiting stars in the galaxy other than the sun. Of over two hundred planets that astronomers have detected around other stars, almost all are hundreds of times larger and heavier than the earth and orbit stars much smaller than the sun.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the above justification of the claim that earthlike worlds form a low percentage of the total number of planets?
There are millions of planets orbiting stars around which astronomers have not attempted to detect planets.
The best current astronomical theories predict that almost all planets around other stars are probably hundreds of times larger than the earth.
A planet orbiting a star similar to the sun would be more likely to be earthlike in size than would a planet orbiting a much smaller star.
The smaller a planet is relative to the star it orbits, the more difficult it is for astronomers to detect.
The observations would have detected any small, earthlike worlds orbiting the stars around which larger planets have been detected.
earthlike worlds form a very low percentage of the planets orbiting stars in the galaxy other than the sun. 意思是环绕除太阳以外的恒星的行星有很多,但其中类似地球的占比很低。接下来说这些行星都是比地球大很多倍,环绕着比太阳小很多倍的恒星。
A,行星的样本总量还可以更大--》这也改变不了像地球的行星占行星总量的比例低的结论
D,行星相对它环绕恒星而言越小,就越难监测到--〉这就是了为什么找不到像地球一样大的行星/找到的都是比地球大得多的行星?因为它们环绕的恒星本来就小;行星与恒星的相对大小越小,比如大小与行星接近而不是大几百倍,就越难监测到。所以目前的监测结果并不能说明像地球的行星占行星总量的比例低。
难点在于理解这个low percentage,到底是谁占谁的percentage?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论