Recent observations suggest that small, earthlike worlds form a very low percentage of the planets orbiting stars in the galaxy other than the sun. Of over two hundred planets that astronomers have detected around other stars, almost all are hundreds of times larger and heavier than the earth and orbit stars much smaller than the sun.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the above justification of the claim that earthlike worlds form a low percentage of the total number of planets?
There are millions of planets orbiting stars around which astronomers have not attempted to detect planets.
The best current astronomical theories predict that almost all planets around other stars are probably hundreds of times larger than the earth.
A planet orbiting a star similar to the sun would be more likely to be earthlike in size than would a planet orbiting a much smaller star.
The smaller a planet is relative to the star it orbits, the more difficult it is for astronomers to detect.
The observations would have detected any small, earthlike worlds orbiting the stars around which larger planets have been detected.
C结论:类地的【小】行星占行星总数的比例很低
P前提:找到了【200多颗】这样的行星,几乎所有的行星都要比地球大。
Weaken 削弱:by 攻击数据样本【200多颗】的代表性(有效性or相关性)
A. 有数以百万计的【行星×】绕着恒星运行,天文学家还没有试图探测到这些行星。(虽然属于质疑样本不够大,但忽略了样本必须是【小】行星,忽略了样本的相关性)
D.行星相对于其运行的恒星越【小√】,天文学家就越难探测。(注意题目当中出现的限定词smaller,对应 此选项的行星范围更窄,更能体现样本的相关性)
D比A更优,更相关,更能得出结论
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论