Some theorists and critics insist that no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist. This opinion is clearly false. The only sound aesthetic evaluations of artists’ works are those that take into account factors such as the era and the place of the artists’ births, their upbringing and education, and the values of their societies—in sum, those factors that are part of their cultural background.
The above argument is most vulnerable to which of the following objections?
The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
The argument cites evidence that undermines rather than supports the conclusion.
The argument draws its conclusion by means of an equivocal interpretation of key terms.
The argument assumes that the production of an effect is evidence of an intention to produce that effect.
The argument assumes that evaluative disputes can be resolved by citing factual evidence.
一些理论家和评论家坚持认为,如果一件艺术作品的审美评价是基于艺术家的文化背景的数据,那么它就不合理。这种观点显然是错误的。对艺术家作品唯一合理的审美评价是那些考虑到诸如艺术家出生的时代和地点、他们的成长和教育、以及他们社会的价值观等因素的综合评价,这些因素是他们文化背景的一部分。所以就是基于文化背景的评价是对的B是支持而非削弱C没有 an equivocal interpretation of key terms Deffect无关 E说争论能不能解决,无关 只有A对
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论