Kayla: Many people are reluctant to shop in our neighborhood because street parking is scarce. The city plans to address this by adding parking meters with time limits that ensure that parking spaces are generally available. But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, so most will probably drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.
Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection?
Most shoppers dislike hunting for scarce street parking spaces much more than they dislike paying for metered parking spaces.
The city could post signs with street parking time limits to ensure that parking spaces become available without forcing shoppers to pay at meters.
Currently, most shoppers in the neighborhood drive only occasionally to shop at malls in other neighborhoods.
The neighborhood already contains a parking lot where shoppers must pay to park.
The nearby malls with free parking have no parking time limits to help ensure that parking spaces in their lots become available.
原文说的是安装parking meter。"But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, "说明这个parking meter天然地是需要付费的。B 提出了一个新的方案,安装signs with street parking time limits意思是停到街上,而不是原方案里的parking meter里,并且停到街上不超时就不用付费。
提出一个新的方案,说这个新方案有效并不能证明老方案无效。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论