Kayla: Many people are reluctant to shop in our neighborhood because street parking is scarce. The city plans to address this by adding parking meters with time limits that ensure that parking spaces are generally available. But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, so most will probably drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.
Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection?
Most shoppers dislike hunting for scarce street parking spaces much more than they dislike paying for metered parking spaces.
The city could post signs with street parking time limits to ensure that parking spaces become available without forcing shoppers to pay at meters.
Currently, most shoppers in the neighborhood drive only occasionally to shop at malls in other neighborhoods.
The neighborhood already contains a parking lot where shoppers must pay to park.
The nearby malls with free parking have no parking time limits to help ensure that parking spaces in their lots become available.
提问的句子有点绕Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city’s plan could make to Kayla’s objection? 一个城市计划的支持者能做出的针对K的拒绝的的最有效的反驳。非常绕,断句断不好就搞晕。意思就是以下哪个反驳了K的话;人民不喜欢停车计时,所以会不来购物。支持计划:增加parking meters确保足够停车空间。手段目的题,B选项是另一个方案,跟我们要讨论的方案无关。C无关选项卡,顾客到底多久来购物无关。D已经有一个需要交费的停车地方,讨论另一个地方无关。E附近免费的停车地方没有时间limites。无关。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论