Mashika: We already know from polling data that some segments of the electorate provide significant support to Ms. Puerta. If those segments also provide significant support to Mr. Quintana, then no segment of the electorate that provides significant support to Mr. Quintana provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.
Salim: But actually, as the latest polling data conclusively shows, at least one segment of the electorate does provide significant support to both Mr. Quintana and Mr. Ramirez.
Among the following statements, which is it most reasonable to infer from the assertions by Mashika and Salim?
At least one segment of the electorate provides significant support neither to Mr. Quintana nor to Mr. Ramirez.
At least one segment of the electorate provides significant support to Ms. Puerta but not to Mr. Quintana.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Ms. Puerta.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Mr. Quintana.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.
Salim的话说明这句话”If those segments also provide significant support to Mr. Quintana, then no segment of the electorate that provides significant support to Mr. Quintana provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.”的结论then...是假,所以其前提if...也是假,即得出:这些支持P的选区全部支持Q是假
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论