Columnist: Metro City has a lower percentage of residents with humanities degrees than any other city of comparable size in our nation. Nationwide, university graduates generally earn more than people who are not university graduates, but those with humanities degrees typically earn less than do graduates with degrees in other disciplines. So the main reason Metro City has higher income per capita than any other city of comparable size in our nation must be its low percentage of residents with humanities degrees.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the columnist's argument?
Metro City residents with humanities degrees have higher income per capita than do people with humanities degrees in any other city of comparable size in the nation.
The percentage of residents with university degrees is lower in Metro City than in any other city of comparable size in the nation.
Nationwide, university graduates without humanities degrees typically earn more than do individuals without university degrees.
Metro City residents with degrees outside the humanities have per capita income no higher than the per capita income of such residents of other cities of comparable size in the nation.
In Metro City, a lower proportion of university graduates have humanities degrees than in any other city of comparable size in the nation.
文章给的前提条件:有大学学历工资高于无学历,其他学历高于h学历,m城人均工资更高
B选项:m大学学历人口比例较其他城市小,但m城人均工资更高,看上去好像是大学学历人口里h学历人口少造成了逆转。但你实际上并不知道大学其他学历的薪酬差距,那万一是m城其他学历的薪酬比其他城市高太多太多呢?
反观D选项:m城其他学历的薪酬不会比其他城市高,我们又知道有大学学历工资高于无学历,那m城人均工资更高基本上就是由于大学学历里h学历的人少导致的
反观D选项里面,m城其他学历的薪酬不会比其他城市高,我们又知道有大学学历工资高于无学历,那m城人均工资更高基本上就是由于大学学历里h学历的人少导致的。
那万一是M城市的没有大学学历的人的工资太低,拉低了M城的平均工资,而不是M城里面大学学历的H学历的比例低 造成M城平均工资低的呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论