The contingency-fee system, which allows lawyers and their clients to agree that the lawyer will be paid only in the event of success, does not increase the number of medical malpractice lawsuits brought against doctors. As attorneys must cover the costs for their time and research, they want to be assured that any medical malpractice case they accept on a contingency-fee basis has substantial merit. Consequently, attorneys turn away many people who come to see them, for lack of a good case.
The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to
specify the criteria attorneys use to judge the merits of a medical malpractice case
consider whether, in the absence of a contingency-fee option, even people with meritorious cases are much less likely to initiate litigation if they believe they might incur large legal fees
note whether, in successful medical malpractice lawsuits, the average monetary award after legal costs have been deducted is less under contingency-fee arrangements than otherwise
consider the effect of the contingency-fee system on the number of lawsuits sought for reasons other than medical malpractice
acknowledge the rising cost of medical malpractice insurance
逻辑链条: contingency-fee system下唯有胜诉律师才能收到钱---工作成本---只接成功率高的案子--- contingency-fee system没有增加医疗诉讼。B,如果回答是yes,没有 contingency-fee system的情况下,即使胜诉可能性高,人们会因为高昂的法律费用而不提起诉讼---有 contingency-fee system的情况下,胜诉后依然要支付高昂的费用,所以人们还是不会提起诉讼。是人们因贫穷而不提起诉讼的问题,不是律师不接案子的问题。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论