The contingency-fee system, which allows lawyers and their clients to agree that the lawyer will be paid only in the event of success, does not increase the number of medical malpractice lawsuits brought against doctors. As attorneys must cover the costs for their time and research, they want to be assured that any medical malpractice case they accept on a contingency-fee basis has substantial merit. Consequently, attorneys turn away many people who come to see them, for lack of a good case.
The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to
specify the criteria attorneys use to judge the merits of a medical malpractice case
consider whether, in the absence of a contingency-fee option, even people with meritorious cases are much less likely to initiate litigation if they believe they might incur large legal fees
note whether, in successful medical malpractice lawsuits, the average monetary award after legal costs have been deducted is less under contingency-fee arrangements than otherwise
consider the effect of the contingency-fee system on the number of lawsuits sought for reasons other than medical malpractice
acknowledge the rising cost of medical malpractice insurance
结论是说:在contingency-fee system之下,律师不会多接案子。
反驳说:就算没有这个系统,案子也不会很多,因为律师费所以没人愿意起诉。
感觉就是个他因?不是contingency-fee system影响了案子的多少,有没有这个contingency-fee system案子都很少。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论