When bitter managerial conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, executives are likely to turn to outside professional counselors to help resolve disagreement.
conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, executives are likely to
conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that might have in the past led to its dissolution, executives likely will
conflicts plague a small company, which in the past it might have led to the business’s dissolution,executives are liable to
conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company,executives are liable to
conflicts, which in the past might have led to its dissolution, plague a small company, executives tend to
be liable to do 有做某事的倾向,后面通常是不好的事情,liable通常是指法律上或者义务上的那种倾向;
be likely to do 很可能做某事,用法更general一些
能问下e为什么不对吗
E选项中its无指代
借这问题在说一下非限制性定语从句和限制性定语从句
假设E选项变为:conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company, executives are likely to
同样选A,不是因为E错,而是因为A更好。which引导的非限定从是对先行词的附加说明,去掉不会影响主句的意思,但是这里明显不能去掉,正是因为conflicts that might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company,才能使得后面的主句更有说服力,即executives are likely to turn to outside professional counsellors to help resolve disagreement
感谢回复!!! 你太厉害了
客气哈~我是菜逼,大佬太多了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论