When bitter managerial conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, executives are likely to turn to outside professional counselors to help resolve disagreement.
conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, executives are likely to
conflicts plague a small company, conflicts that might have in the past led to its dissolution, executives likely will
conflicts plague a small company, which in the past it might have led to the business’s dissolution,executives are liable to
conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company,executives are liable to
conflicts, which in the past might have led to its dissolution, plague a small company, executives tend to
E选项中its无指代
借这问题在说一下非限制性定语从句和限制性定语从句
假设E选项变为:conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company, executives are likely to
同样选A,不是因为E错,而是因为A更好。which引导的非限定从是对先行词的附加说明,去掉不会影响主句的意思,但是这里明显不能去掉,正是因为conflicts that might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company,才能使得后面的主句更有说服力,即executives are likely to turn to outside professional counsellors to help resolve disagreement
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论